Suppr超能文献

在质谱分析方法中,评估内源性尿液生物标志物以间接检测五种不同化学掺假剂对尿液的掺假企图。

Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine adulteration attempts by five different chemical adulterants in mass spectrometry methods.

作者信息

Steuer Andrea E, Kamber Dominique, Kraemer Thomas

机构信息

Department of Forensic Pharmacology & Toxicology, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Drug Test Anal. 2019 May;11(5):638-648. doi: 10.1002/dta.2539. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

Reliable detection of urine adulteration attempts to circumvent positive drug testing represents a critical step for laboratories in abstinence control settings. An ideal workflow for high-throughput testing would involve simultaneous detection of adulteration attempts in the same run with drug detection. Monitoring of degraded or oxidized endogenous urinary compounds as indirect markers has been previously evaluated for that purpose exemplified for the adulterant potassium nitrite (KNO ). Fifteen, previously identified endogenous markers should now be evaluated for their general applicability to detect adulteration attempts for the adulterants hypochlorite-based bleach (NaOCl), peroxidase and peroxide (H O ), pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC), and iodine (I ). Initial experiments revealed similar results for the tested adulterants regarding degradation of indolylacryloylglycine (IAG), uric acid (UA), or UA derivatives. 5-Hydroxyisourate (HIU), the oxidation product of UA, was however only formed by KNO , PCC, and H O . Amino acids showed larger adulterant-dependent differences. All reactions were shown to be influenced by the adulterant concentration and the urinary pH with large variances depending on compound and adulterant. Except for HIU/PCC, all markers were stable within +/- 30% variation for all adulterants at -20°C. Receiver operating characteristics indicated best sensitivity and specificity over all adulterants for IAG (specificity 0.9, sensitivity 1.0) and UA (specificity 1.0, sensitivity 0.9). HIU gave best results for KNO , PCC, and H O and N-acetylneuraminic acid for PCC and H O , respectively. When integrating a limited number of targets into existing screening methods, monitoring of UA, IAG, N-acetylneuraminic acid, and HIU is recommended.

摘要

可靠地检测尿液掺假以规避药物阳性检测,是戒毒场所实验室的关键一步。高通量检测的理想工作流程应包括在同一次检测中同时检测掺假企图和药物。此前已评估过监测降解或氧化的内源性尿化合物作为间接标志物,以检测掺假企图,例如掺假剂亚硝酸钾(KNO)。现在应评估15种先前确定的内源性标志物,以确定它们对检测基于次氯酸盐的漂白剂(NaOCl)、过氧化物酶和过氧化物(H₂O₂)、氯铬酸吡啶鎓(PCC)和碘(I₂)等掺假剂的掺假企图的普遍适用性。初步实验表明,对于所测试的掺假剂,吲哚丙烯酰甘氨酸(IAG)、尿酸(UA)或UA衍生物的降解情况结果相似。然而,UA的氧化产物5-羟基异尿酸(HIU)仅由KNO、PCC和H₂O₂形成。氨基酸显示出更大的掺假剂依赖性差异。所有反应都显示受掺假剂浓度和尿液pH值影响,不同化合物和掺假剂的差异很大。除了HIU/PCC外,所有标志物在-20°C下对所有掺假剂的变化在±30%范围内都是稳定的。受试者工作特征曲线表明,IAG(特异性0.9,敏感性1.0)和UA(特异性1.0,敏感性0.9)对所有掺假剂的敏感性和特异性最佳。HIU对KNO、PCC和H₂O₂的检测效果最佳,N-乙酰神经氨酸分别对PCC和H₂O₂的检测效果最佳。当将有限数量的目标物整合到现有筛查方法中时,建议监测UA、IAG、N-乙酰神经氨酸和HIU。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验