Feld R, Evans W K, Coy P, Hodson I, MacDonald A S, Osoba D, Payne D, Shelley W, Pater J L
J Clin Oncol. 1987 Sep;5(9):1401-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.9.1401.
In order to assess the effect of scheduling of chemotherapy on the outcome of patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada carried out a randomized trial comparing the alternation of cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH; doxorubicin) and vincristine (CAV) with etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin for six cycles to the administration of these two combinations in a sequential fashion (three cycles of CAV followed by three of VP-16/cisplatin). Three hundred eligible patients were enrolled on the trial from September 1981 to October 1984. All responding patients were also treated after completion of chemotherapy with thoracic irradiation in randomly allocated doses of 2,000 and 3,750 cGy. The complete response (CR) rate to chemotherapy was slightly, but not significantly, higher on the alternating arm (52% v 44%, P = .20). However, there was no difference in disease-free or overall survival on the alternating and sequential arms, respectively (47.3 weeks v 45.1 weeks, P = .26; 61.7 weeks v 59.5 weeks, P = .56). Data on the effect of radiotherapy dose on survival are not yet mature, but it does not appear the results of this portion of the trial will alter the interpretation of the chemotherapy comparison. Patient characteristics favorably influencing survival were female sex, good performance status, younger age, and absence of supraclavicular node involvement. Two interpretations of these and other results in SCLC are suggested: (1) the difference between the schedules used is too small for the predictions of the Goldie-Coldman model to be realized in a trial of this size, or (2) VP-16/cisplatin is actually a superior regimen and any schedule that exposes patients to these drugs early in treatment will produce improved results.
为评估化疗方案对局限期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者预后的影响,加拿大国立癌症研究所临床试验组开展了一项随机试验,比较环磷酰胺、阿霉素(阿德里亚实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市;多柔比星)和长春新碱(CAV)交替使用与依托泊苷(VP - 16)和顺铂联合使用六个周期,与这两种联合方案序贯给药(三个周期的CAV,随后三个周期的VP - 16/顺铂)的效果。1981年9月至1984年10月,300名符合条件的患者参加了该试验。所有缓解患者在化疗结束后还接受了胸部放疗,随机分配的剂量为2000 cGy和3750 cGy。交替治疗组化疗的完全缓解(CR)率略高,但无显著差异(52%对44%,P = 0.20)。然而,交替治疗组和序贯治疗组的无病生存期或总生存期分别无差异(47.3周对45.1周,P = 0.26;61.7周对59.5周,P = 0.56)。关于放疗剂量对生存影响的数据尚未成熟,但该试验这部分的结果似乎不会改变化疗比较的解释。对生存有有利影响的患者特征包括女性、良好的体能状态、较年轻以及无锁骨上淋巴结受累。对SCLC的这些及其他结果提出了两种解释:(1)所用方案之间的差异太小,以至于在这个规模的试验中无法实现戈迪 - 戈德曼模型的预测,或者(2)VP - 16/顺铂实际上是一种更优的方案,任何在治疗早期让患者接触这些药物的方案都会产生更好的结果。