Donas Konstantinos P, Usai Marco V, Taneva Gergana T, Criado Frank J, Torsello Giovanni B, Kubilis Paul, Scali Salvatore, Veith Frank J
1 Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
2 Clinic of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Vascular. 2019 Apr;27(2):175-180. doi: 10.1177/1708538118811212. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
Chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is gaining ever greater acceptance. However, persistent gutters leading to type IA endoleaks represent an unsolved issue. The aim of the current study was to analyze the impact of abdominal endograft oversizing to the occurrence of this phenomenon.
The PERformance of the snorkel/chImney endovascular teChnique in the treatment of compLex aortic PathologiesES registry includes the largest experience with chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from 13 vascular centers in Europe and the U.S. Prospectively collected data from centers with standard use of the Endurant stent-graft and balloon-expandable covered stents as chimney grafts only were included in the present analysis. The parameter which varied was the degree of oversizing of the aortic stent-graft classifying the cohort in two groups, group A (20% and less oversizing) and group B (>20% of oversizing). The primary endpoint was the incidence of persistent type IA endoleak needed reintervention. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and freedom from reintervention.
Group A included 21 patients while group B 144. The mean preoperative pathology's neck length and diameter was 5.8 mm (±4.4) versus 4.9 mm (±3.8) and 27.6 mm (±4.7) versus 24.9 mm (±3.7) for group A and group B, respectively. The mean length of the new sealing zone after chimney graft placement was similar for both groups (group A versus group B; 17.9 mm versus 18.3 mm, respectively, P = .21). The percentage of oversizing of the aortic stent-graft ranged between 13.8 and 20% versus 22.2 and 30%, for group A and group B, respectively. Patients of group A had more type 1A endoleaks, (14.3%) versus patients of group B (2.1%) based on the first follow-up imaging, P = .02. The incidence of persistent type IA endoleaks needing a reintervention was 14.3 and 1.4% for the group A and group B, respectively, P = .01. The mean volume of contrast medium used was greater in group A versus group B with 239 ml versus150 ml, P = .05. Additionally, 14.3% of patients of group A experienced acute renal failure compared to those in group B which was 1.0%, P = .01.
Oversizing of ideally 30% of the Endurant stent-graft is associated with significant lower incidence of type IA endoleaks requiring reintervention for patients treated by chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
烟囱式血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术越来越被广泛接受。然而,导致IA型内漏的持续性“沟壑”仍是一个未解决的问题。本研究的目的是分析腹部移植物尺寸过大对这一现象发生的影响。
“用于治疗复杂主动脉病变的通气管/烟囱式血管腔内技术的性能”登记研究纳入了来自欧洲和美国13个血管中心的烟囱式血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术的最大规模经验。本分析仅纳入了前瞻性收集的来自规范使用Endurant覆膜支架和球囊扩张式覆膜支架作为烟囱式移植物的中心的数据。变化的参数是主动脉覆膜支架的尺寸过大程度,将队列分为两组,A组(尺寸过大20%及以下)和B组(尺寸过大超过20%)。主要终点是需要再次干预的持续性IA型内漏的发生率。次要终点是全因死亡率和无需再次干预。
A组包括21例患者,B组包括144例患者。A组和B组术前病变颈部的平均长度和直径分别为5.8 mm(±4.4)与4.9 mm(±3.8)以及27.6 mm(±4.7)与24.9 mm(±3.7)。烟囱式移植物置入后新密封区的平均长度在两组中相似(A组与B组分别为17.9 mm与18.3 mm,P = 0.21)。主动脉覆膜支架的尺寸过大百分比在A组和B组中分别为13.8%至20%与22.2%至30%。根据首次随访影像学检查,A组患者的1A型内漏更多(14.3%),而B组患者为(2.1%),P = 0.02。需要再次干预的持续性IA型内漏的发生率在A组和B组中分别为14.3%和1.4%,P = 0.01。A组使用的造影剂平均量大于B组,分别为239 ml与150 ml,P = 0.05。此外,A组14.3%的患者发生急性肾衰竭,而B组为1.0%,P = 0.01。
对于接受烟囱式血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术的患者,理想情况下Endurant覆膜支架尺寸过大30%与需要再次干预的IA型内漏发生率显著降低相关。