Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1332-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Central venous catheterisation in neonates is difficult. The purpose of this study was to compare the Seldinger and modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterisation in neonates.
In this randomised, controlled trial, 120 neonates (≤1 month old) requiring central venous catheterisation under general anaesthesia were allocated into either the Seldinger (n=60) or the modified Seldinger (n=60) group. The primary outcome was the incidence of successful catheterisation on the first attempt. We also assessed the incidences of successful puncture on the first attempt, successful guide wire insertion on the first attempt, and successful final catheterisation.
The primary outcome, the incidence of successful catheterisation on the first attempt was higher in the modified Seldinger group than in the Seldinger group (83% vs 65%; relative risk=1.282; 95% confidence interval, 1.032-1.594; P=0.025). The incidence of successful guide wire insertion on the first attempt was also higher in the modified Seldinger group (95% vs 75%; relative risk=1.267; 95% confidence interval, 1.082-1.482; P=0.003). Other incidences did not differ significantly between the groups.
For ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterisation in neonates, the modified Seldinger technique showed superiority over the Seldinger technique in terms of successful catheterisation and guide wire insertion on the first attempt.
NCT02688595.
新生儿中心静脉置管较为困难。本研究旨在比较超声引导下新生儿颈内静脉穿刺的 Seldinger 法和改良 Seldinger 法。
本随机对照试验纳入了 120 例需在全身麻醉下进行中心静脉置管的新生儿(≤1 个月),并将其分为 Seldinger 组(n=60)和改良 Seldinger 组(n=60)。主要结局为首次尝试置管的成功率。我们还评估了首次尝试穿刺成功率、首次尝试导丝插入成功率和最终置管成功率。
改良 Seldinger 组首次尝试置管成功率高于 Seldinger 组(83% vs 65%;相对风险=1.282;95%置信区间,1.032-1.594;P=0.025)。改良 Seldinger 组首次尝试导丝插入成功率也更高(95% vs 75%;相对风险=1.267;95%置信区间,1.082-1.482;P=0.003)。其他指标在两组间无显著差异。
对于超声引导下新生儿颈内静脉置管,改良 Seldinger 法在首次尝试置管和导丝插入的成功率方面优于 Seldinger 法。
NCT02688595。