Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Sports Health. 2019 May/Jun;11(3):242-246. doi: 10.1177/1941738118812454. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
Measurement properties of the short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR) are not established in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the KOOS-JR measures the construct of knee health in individuals post-ACLR using Rasch analysis.
The KOOS-JR will fit the Rasch model, but significant ceiling effects will be present.
Cross-sectional study.
Level 3.
Rasch analysis of the KOOS-JR from 166 individuals 10 months post-ACLR was conducted. Unidimensionality, a key criterion of the Rasch model, was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Model fit of the rating scale, items, and persons were evaluated. Mean square fit statistics ≥1.6 and standardized z-scores ≥2.0 were indicative of person or item misfit. Additionally, reliability indicators including person reliability and separation indices were examined.
The KOOS-JR fit the criteria of unidimensionality. All items demonstrated model fit; however, ceiling effects were noted (n = 36; 22%). Person reliability was low (0.47). Calculation of person strata revealed that the KOOS-JR did not separate participants into more than 1 stratum. The mean person measure was 3.56 logits higher than the mean item measure, indicating that this sample is skewed toward increased knee health.
Although the KOOS-JR represented a unidimensional construct with items and persons fitting the Rasch model, several limitations were noted: ceiling effects, low person reliability, and poor person differentiation. Ceiling effects indicate that many individuals in this sample experienced better knee health than the KOOS-JR items were able to measure.
Evaluating the measurement properties of the KOOS-JR is necessary to determine its clinical value in sports medicine. In later stages after ACLR recovery, administration of the KOOS-JR may not be adequate.
在进行前交叉韧带重建(ACL)后,短版膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS-JR)的测量属性尚未在个体中得到确定。本研究的目的是使用 Rasch 分析确定 KOOS-JR 在 ACL 后个体中测量膝关节健康结构的程度。
KOOS-JR 将符合 Rasch 模型,但会存在显著的天花板效应。
横断面研究。
3 级。
对 166 名 ACL 后 10 个月的个体的 KOOS-JR 进行 Rasch 分析。使用验证性因子分析评估 Rasch 模型的关键标准——单维性。评估评分量表、项目和个体的模型拟合。平方拟合统计量≥1.6 和标准化 z 分数≥2.0 表示个体或项目不匹配。此外,还检查了可靠性指标,包括个体可靠性和分离指数。
KOOS-JR 符合单维性标准。所有项目均符合模型要求;然而,注意到天花板效应(n=36;22%)。个体可靠性较低(0.47)。计算个体层次结构表明,KOOS-JR 不能将参与者分为超过 1 个层次。KOOS-JR 的平均个体得分比平均项目得分高 3.56 对数单位,表明该样本偏向于膝关节健康状况的改善。
尽管 KOOS-JR 代表了一个具有符合 Rasch 模型的项目和个体的单维结构,但仍存在几个局限性:天花板效应、个体可靠性低和个体区分度差。天花板效应表明,该样本中的许多个体的膝关节健康状况比 KOOS-JR 项目能够测量的要好。
评估 KOOS-JR 的测量属性对于确定其在运动医学中的临床价值是必要的。在 ACL 后恢复的后期阶段,使用 KOOS-JR 可能不够充分。