Kim Yong Won, Kim Hyung Il, Hwang Sung Oh, Kim Yoon Seop, An Gyo Jin, Cha Kyoung Chul
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Dec;59(10):1232-1239. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.10.1232.
Recent basic life support (BLS) guidelines recommend a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio (CV2) or chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC); however, there are inevitable risks of interruption of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in CV2 and hypoxemia in CC. In this study, we compared the short-term outcomes among CC, CV2, and 30:1 CV ratio (CV1).
In total, 42 pigs were randomly assigned to CC, CV1, or CV2 groups. After induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF), we observed pigs for 2 minutes without any intervention. Thereafter, BLS was started according to the assigned method and performed for 8 minutes. Defibrillation was performed after BLS and repeated every 2 minutes, followed by rhythm analysis. Advanced cardiac life support, including continuous chest compression with ventilation every 6 seconds and intravenous injection of 1 mg epinephrine every 4 minutes, was performed until the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or 22 minutes after VF induction. Hemodynamic parameters and arterial blood gas profiles were compared among groups. ROSC, 24-hour survival, and neurologic outcomes were evaluated at 24 hours.
The hemodynamic parameters during CPR did not differ among the study groups. Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood and arterial oxygen saturation were lowest in the CC group, compared to those in the other groups, during the BLS period (=0.002 and <0.001, respectively). The CV1 groups showed a significantly higher rate of favorable neurologic outcome (swine CPC 1 or 2) than the other groups (=0.044).
CPR with CV1 could promote better neurologic outcome than CV2 and CC.
近期的基础生命支持(BLS)指南推荐采用30:2的按压与通气比(CV2)或仅进行胸外按压的心肺复苏(CC);然而,在CV2中存在不可避免的高质量心肺复苏(CPR)中断风险,而在CC中存在低氧血症风险。在本研究中,我们比较了CC、CV2和30:1通气比(CV1)的短期结局。
总共42头猪被随机分配至CC、CV1或CV2组。诱发心室颤动(VF)后,我们在无任何干预的情况下观察猪2分钟。此后,根据指定方法开始进行BLS,并持续8分钟。BLS后进行除颤,每2分钟重复一次,随后进行心律分析。进行高级心脏生命支持,包括每6秒进行一次持续胸外按压并通气,每4分钟静脉注射1毫克肾上腺素,直至自主循环恢复(ROSC)或VF诱发后22分钟。比较各组的血流动力学参数和动脉血气指标。在24小时时评估ROSC、24小时生存率和神经学结局。
CPR期间的血流动力学参数在各研究组之间无差异。在BLS期间,与其他组相比,CC组的动脉血氧分压和动脉血氧饱和度最低(分别为P = 0.002和P < 0.001)。CV1组的良好神经学结局(猪脑功能分类1或2级)发生率显著高于其他组(P = 0.044)。
与CV2和CC相比,采用CV1进行CPR可促进更好的神经学结局。