Wells Mike, Barnes Laurice, Vincent-Lambert Craig
Department of Emergency Medical Care, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;8(2):51-54. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
The choice of weight estimation method to use during prehospital paediatric emergency care is important because it needs to be both accurate and easy to use. Accuracy is important to ensure optimum drug dosing while ease-of-use is important to minimise user errors and the cognitive load experienced by healthcare providers. Little is known about which weight estimation systems are used in the prehospital environment anywhere in the world. This knowledge is important because if the use of inappropriate weight estimation practices is identified, it could be remedied through education and institutional policies.
This was a prospective questionnaire study conducted in Johannesburg, South Africa, which obtained information on the knowledge, attitude and practice of weight estimation amongst advanced life support (ALS) paramedics.
Forty participants were enrolled, from both the public and private sectors. The participants' preferred method of weight estimation was visual estimation (7/40; 18%), age-based formulas (16/40; 40%), parental estimation (3/40; 8%), the Broselow tape (2/40; 5%) and the PAWPER tape (11/40; 28%). No participant was familiar with or used the Mercy method. All participants were very confident in the accuracy of their selected system.
The knowledge and understanding of weight estimation systems by many advanced life support paramedics was poor and the use of inappropriate weight estimation systems was common. Further education and intervention is needed in order to change the sub-optimal weight estimation practices of ALS paramedics in Johannesburg.
在院前儿科急救中选择使用的体重估计方法很重要,因为它既需要准确又要易于使用。准确性对于确保最佳药物剂量很重要,而易于使用对于尽量减少用户错误和医护人员的认知负担很重要。对于世界上任何地方的院前环境中使用哪种体重估计系统,人们知之甚少。这一知识很重要,因为如果发现使用了不适当的体重估计方法,可以通过教育和机构政策加以纠正。
这是一项在南非约翰内斯堡进行的前瞻性问卷调查研究,获取了有关高级生命支持(ALS)护理人员体重估计的知识、态度和实践的信息。
共有40名参与者,来自公共和私营部门。参与者首选的体重估计方法是视觉估计(7/40;18%)、基于年龄的公式(16/40;40%)、家长估计(3/40;8%)、 Broselow卷尺(2/40;5%)和PAWPER卷尺(11/40;28%)。没有参与者熟悉或使用Mercy方法。所有参与者对其所选系统的准确性都非常有信心。
许多高级生命支持护理人员对体重估计系统的知识和理解较差,使用不适当的体重估计系统很常见。需要进一步的教育和干预,以改变约翰内斯堡ALS护理人员次优的体重估计做法。