Lerch Matthias, Windhagen Henning, Kurtz Agnes-Elisabeth, Budde Stefan, Behrens Bernd-Arno, Bouguecha Anas, Almohallami Amer
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries Straße 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Institute of Forming Technology and Machines, Leibniz University Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823 Garbsen, Germany.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Jan;61:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
We applied a previously established and validated numerical model to a novel short-stemmed implant for a 'pre-launch' investigation.
The implant system consists of two different implant geometries for valgus/varus-positioned proximal femurs with differences in volume distribution, head/neck angle, and calcar alignment. The aim of the design was to achieve a better adaption to the anatomic conditions, resulting in a favourable load transfer. The implant type G showed the best fit to our model, but both stem geometries were implanted; the implant type B was used to compute an 'imperfection scenario'.
Apparent bone density decreased by 4.3% in the entire femur with the implant type G, and by 12.3% with the implant type B. Bone mass loss was pronounced in the proximal calcar region. Apparent bone density increased at the lateral cortical ring and in the minor trochanter. The apparent bone density in the imperfection scenario was very similar to that of a straight stem, indicating a distal load transfer.
No adverse effects of the A2 short-stemmed implant system on bone remodeling could be detected. The overall bone density reduction was acceptable, and wedge fixation was not observed, indicating that there was no distal load transfer. The simulation of an incongruous implant indicates the sensitivity of our model in response to modifications of implant positioning. Correct implant selection and positioning is crucial when using the A2 system.
我们将一个先前建立并验证的数值模型应用于一种新型短柄植入物,进行“上市前”研究。
该植入系统由两种不同的植入物几何形状组成,用于外翻/内翻定位的股骨近端,在体积分布、头颈角度和小转子对线方面存在差异。设计目的是更好地适应解剖条件,从而实现有利的负荷传递。植入物G型与我们的模型拟合最佳,但两种柄部几何形状的植入物都进行了植入;植入物B型用于计算“缺陷情况”。
使用植入物G型时,整个股骨的表观骨密度下降了4.3%,使用植入物B型时下降了12.3%。近端小转子区域的骨量流失明显。外侧皮质环和小转子处的表观骨密度增加。缺陷情况下的表观骨密度与直柄植入物非常相似,表明负荷向远端传递。
未检测到A2短柄植入系统对骨重塑有不良影响。整体骨密度降低是可以接受的,未观察到楔形固定,表明不存在负荷向远端传递。模拟不协调的植入物表明我们的模型对植入物位置改变的敏感性。使用A2系统时,正确选择和定位植入物至关重要。