Pandav Vijay, Dandapat Sudeepta, Bohnstedt Bradley N
Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:84-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.139. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
The purpose of this study is to describe the use of the Penumbra Occlusion Device (POD), which is a coil with an enhanced anchor segment, along with standard coils for carotid and vertebral artery sacrifice, and to assess its feasibility, safety, and efficacy.
This is a retrospective chart review of patients with vessel sacrifices who were treated using POD. For the procedure, a balloon test occlusion was performed prior to permanent arterial sacrifice. Following this, a POD was deployed followed by subsequent angiography to confirm occlusion. Secondary PODs or standard coils were deployed as necessary.
A total of 5 internal carotid arteries and 5 vertebral arteries were treated in 10 patients. The mean vessel diameter of the vessel sacrificed was 4 mm (range 2.9-7.7 mm). The total mean number of coils required for vessel sacrifice was 7 (range 3-17). The mean number of PODs used for vessel sacrifice was 2.4 (range, 1-6). The mean number of additional standard coils used was 4.1 (range, 0-13). 9/10 (90%) parent arteries were successfully occluded. One patient had slow flow distal to the occluded segment. One (10%) of the patients had a delayed ischemic event. There were no immediate periprocedural complications including coil migrations or vessel dissections. 6/10 patients had follow-up imaging and no patients developed recanalization during the follow-up period.
Parent vessel sacrifice using a combination of PODs and standard coils appear to be a feasible, safe and effective alternative to the traditional vessel sacrifice techniques.
本研究旨在描述Penumbra封堵装置(POD,一种带有增强锚定段的线圈)与标准线圈联合用于颈动脉和椎动脉牺牲术的情况,并评估其可行性、安全性和有效性。
这是一项对使用POD进行血管牺牲术患者的回顾性病历审查。对于该手术,在永久性动脉牺牲术前进行球囊试验性闭塞。在此之后,部署POD,随后进行血管造影以确认闭塞。必要时部署辅助POD或标准线圈。
10例患者共治疗了5条颈内动脉和5条椎动脉。牺牲血管的平均直径为4毫米(范围2.9 - 7.7毫米)。血管牺牲所需线圈的总平均数为7个(范围3 - 17个)。用于血管牺牲的POD平均数量为2.4个(范围1 - 6个)。额外使用的标准线圈平均数量为4.1个(范围0 - 13个)。9/10(90%)的供血动脉成功闭塞。1例患者在闭塞段远端血流缓慢。1例(10%)患者发生延迟性缺血事件。术中无包括线圈移位或血管夹层在内的即刻并发症。6/10例患者进行了随访成像,随访期间无患者发生再通。
联合使用POD和标准线圈进行供血血管牺牲术似乎是传统血管牺牲技术的一种可行、安全且有效的替代方法。