Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;25(4):656-663. doi: 10.1111/jep.13073. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Focusing on the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of adult cancers, the objectives of this study were to (a) describe the intrinsic elements known to influence CPG use; (b) identify the ways in which CPGs are implemented; and (c) explore how CPG characteristics and contextual factors influence implementation and use.
We conducted a sequential mixed methods study. First, we performed a content analysis of all CPGs developed and approved for the management of adult cancers in Nova Scotia, Canada, from 2005 to 2015. CPGs were examined for the presence of 22 elements known to influence CPG use. Next, we conducted semistructured interviews with CPG developers and end users. Participants were purposively sampled, based on the findings of the content analysis. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed by two researchers using the Framework Method.
CPGs (n = 20) demonstrated large variation with respect to elements shown to influence CPG use. For example, 85% included content related to individualization and objectives. Yet no CPGs (0%) had journal or patient versions; discussed the education, training, or competencies needed to deliver recommendations; contained an explicit statement on anticipated work changes, or on potential direct or productivity costs; or identified barriers or facilitators that might influence CPG adoption. Interview data from CPG developers (n = 4) and users (n = 6) revealed five themes related to CPG implementation and use: (a) lack of consistency in CPG development; (b) timing and nature of stakeholder engagement; (c) credibility of the CPG development process and final CPGs; (d) limited understanding of implementation as an active process; and (e) factors at organizational and system levels influence CPG implementation and use.
This mixed methods study provides complementary data that may help inform more effective CPG implementation efforts and optimize their use in practice.
背景、目的和目标:本研究聚焦于实施成人癌症管理的临床实践指南(CPG),其目的在于:(a)描述已知影响 CPG 使用的内在因素;(b)确定 CPG 的实施方式;(c)探讨 CPG 特征和背景因素如何影响实施和使用。
我们进行了一项顺序混合方法研究。首先,我们对 2005 年至 2015 年期间在加拿大新斯科舍省开发并批准的所有用于管理成人癌症的 CPG 进行了内容分析。检查了 CPG 是否存在已知影响 CPG 使用的 22 个因素。其次,我们对 CPG 开发者和最终用户进行了半结构化访谈。根据内容分析的结果,对参与者进行了有针对性的抽样。所有访谈均进行了录音并逐字记录。两名研究人员使用框架方法对数据进行分析。
CPG(n=20)在影响 CPG 使用的因素方面表现出很大的差异。例如,85%的 CPG 包含与个体化和目标相关的内容。然而,没有任何 CPG(0%)有期刊或患者版本;没有讨论提供建议所需的教育、培训或能力;没有明确说明预期的工作变化,或潜在的直接或生产力成本;或确定可能影响 CPG 采用的障碍或促进因素。来自 CPG 开发者(n=4)和用户(n=6)的访谈数据揭示了与 CPG 实施和使用相关的五个主题:(a)CPG 开发缺乏一致性;(b)利益相关者参与的时间和性质;(c)CPG 开发过程和最终 CPG 的可信度;(d)对实施作为一个积极过程的理解有限;(e)组织和系统层面的因素影响 CPG 的实施和使用。
这项混合方法研究提供了互补的数据,可能有助于为更有效的 CPG 实施工作提供信息,并优化其在实践中的使用。