Gassen Jeffrey, Bradshaw Hannah K, Hill Sarah E
1 Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918812124. doi: 10.1177/1474704918812124.
The human menstrual cycle is characterized by substantial variability both within and between women. Here, we sought to account for such variability by examining whether human menstrual cycle frequency varies as a function of the projected fitness payoffs associated with investment in mating effort. We used structural equation modeling to test the prediction that women whose environmental conditions or life histories favor heavier investment in mating effort would have shorter, more regular cycles. Results supported our hypothesis, revealing that women who project more mating success and have faster life history strategies exhibit greater mating effort and shorter, more regular menstrual cycles. An alternative model that specified cycle frequency as a predictor of mating effort was a poor fit for the data, lending support for the hypothesized directionality of the path between these variables. Together, these results provide some of the first empirical evidence that the length and regularity of the human menstrual cycle may be calibrated to investment in mating effort.
人类月经周期的特点是女性个体内部以及不同女性之间存在显著差异。在此,我们试图通过研究人类月经周期频率是否会随着与交配投入相关的预期适应性收益而变化,来解释这种差异。我们使用结构方程模型来检验这一预测,即环境条件或生活史有利于增加交配投入的女性会有更短、更规律的月经周期。结果支持了我们的假设,表明预计交配成功率更高且生活史策略更快的女性表现出更大的交配投入以及更短、更规律的月经周期。另一个将周期频率指定为交配投入预测指标的模型与数据拟合不佳,这为这些变量之间路径的假设方向性提供了支持。总之,这些结果提供了一些初步的实证证据,表明人类月经周期的长度和规律性可能会根据交配投入进行校准。