Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
BACKGROUND: Clinical scoring systems are increasingly important and popular for the evaluation of orthopedic patients. Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new elbow-specific assessment score to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness. METHODS: The new system, the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS), was developed in 3 portions: elbow motion capacities, elbow-related symptoms, and patient satisfaction level. A total of 73 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach α values were calculated for test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the SHEDS with previously validated scoring systems. Effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for responsiveness. RESULTS: Positive reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 and adequate homogeneity with a Cronbach α value of 0.74 were found for the SHEDS. Good to excellent validity using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) were determined for the total (0.51-0.82), motion (0.65-0.89), and symptom (0.35-0.53) scores. Responsiveness was large for the total ES, 3.48; SRM, 2.96), motion (ES, 2.54; SRM, 2.08), and symptom (ES, 1.26; SRM, 1.14) scores. There were no ceiling or floor effects. Significant positive correlations were found between patient satisfaction levels and the final scores (SCC, 0.62), as well as the score changes of the SHEDS (SCC, 0.42). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the newly developed SHEDS is an excellent, comprehensive, valid scoring system to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness.
背景:临床评分系统对于评估骨科患者越来越重要且受欢迎。肘部僵硬通常会导致功能障碍和上肢残疾。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种新的肘部专用评估评分系统,以评估肘部僵硬患者的关节功能。
方法:新系统上海肘部功能障碍评分(SHEDS)由 3 部分组成:肘部运动能力、肘部相关症状和患者满意度。共前瞻性纳入 73 例肘部僵硬患者。计算了组内相关系数和 Cronbach α 值,分别用于测试-重测可靠性和内部一致性。通过与先前验证的评分系统相关联来评估构效关系。计算了效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM),以评估反应度。
结果:SHEDS 的组内相关系数为 0.83,具有较高的可靠性,Cronbach α 值为 0.74,具有良好的同质性。总评分(0.51-0.82)、运动评分(0.65-0.89)和症状评分(0.35-0.53)的 Spearman 相关系数(SCC)均为良好至极好。总评分的反应度较大,为 3.48;SRM,为 2.96)、运动评分(ES,2.54;SRM,2.08)和症状评分(ES,1.26;SRM,1.14)。无天花板或地板效应。患者满意度水平与最终评分(SCC,0.62)以及 SHEDS 评分变化(SCC,0.42)呈显著正相关。
结论:我们的结果表明,新开发的 SHEDS 是一种评估肘部僵硬患者关节功能的优秀、全面、有效的评分系统。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018-8-21
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998-2
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018-7-9
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017-6
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004-11
Br Med Bull. 2008
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013-4-3
Bone Jt Open. 2020-9-18
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019-3-25