文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

上海肘部功能障碍评分:一种用于肘部僵硬患者的新型肘部特异性评分系统的制定与验证。

Development and validation of a new elbow-specific scoring system for patients with elbow stiffness: the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Nov 22.


DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.007
PMID:30472055
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical scoring systems are increasingly important and popular for the evaluation of orthopedic patients. Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new elbow-specific assessment score to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness. METHODS: The new system, the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS), was developed in 3 portions: elbow motion capacities, elbow-related symptoms, and patient satisfaction level. A total of 73 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach α values were calculated for test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the SHEDS with previously validated scoring systems. Effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for responsiveness. RESULTS: Positive reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 and adequate homogeneity with a Cronbach α value of 0.74 were found for the SHEDS. Good to excellent validity using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) were determined for the total (0.51-0.82), motion (0.65-0.89), and symptom (0.35-0.53) scores. Responsiveness was large for the total ES, 3.48; SRM, 2.96), motion (ES, 2.54; SRM, 2.08), and symptom (ES, 1.26; SRM, 1.14) scores. There were no ceiling or floor effects. Significant positive correlations were found between patient satisfaction levels and the final scores (SCC, 0.62), as well as the score changes of the SHEDS (SCC, 0.42). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the newly developed SHEDS is an excellent, comprehensive, valid scoring system to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness.

摘要

背景:临床评分系统对于评估骨科患者越来越重要且受欢迎。肘部僵硬通常会导致功能障碍和上肢残疾。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种新的肘部专用评估评分系统,以评估肘部僵硬患者的关节功能。

方法:新系统上海肘部功能障碍评分(SHEDS)由 3 部分组成:肘部运动能力、肘部相关症状和患者满意度。共前瞻性纳入 73 例肘部僵硬患者。计算了组内相关系数和 Cronbach α 值,分别用于测试-重测可靠性和内部一致性。通过与先前验证的评分系统相关联来评估构效关系。计算了效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM),以评估反应度。

结果:SHEDS 的组内相关系数为 0.83,具有较高的可靠性,Cronbach α 值为 0.74,具有良好的同质性。总评分(0.51-0.82)、运动评分(0.65-0.89)和症状评分(0.35-0.53)的 Spearman 相关系数(SCC)均为良好至极好。总评分的反应度较大,为 3.48;SRM,为 2.96)、运动评分(ES,2.54;SRM,2.08)和症状评分(ES,1.26;SRM,1.14)。无天花板或地板效应。患者满意度水平与最终评分(SCC,0.62)以及 SHEDS 评分变化(SCC,0.42)呈显著正相关。

结论:我们的结果表明,新开发的 SHEDS 是一种评估肘部僵硬患者关节功能的优秀、全面、有效的评分系统。

相似文献

[1]
Development and validation of a new elbow-specific scoring system for patients with elbow stiffness: the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018-11-22

[2]
Validation of the Liverpool Elbow Score for evaluation of elbow stiffness.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018-8-21

[3]
Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998-2

[4]
The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score: Psychometric Properties, Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version.

Eval Health Prof. 2024-3

[5]
The Specific AC Score (SACS): a new and validated method of assessment of isolated acromioclavicular joint pathology.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018-7-9

[6]
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017-6

[7]
Development and validation of an elbow score.

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004-11

[8]
Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.

Br Med Bull. 2008

[9]
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation.

J Orthop Sci. 2013-9

[10]
A novel patellofemoral scoring system for patellofemoral joint status.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013-4-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a novel subscapularis outcome score: the Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score.

JSES Int. 2022-9-8

[2]
What constitutes a clinically important change in Mayo Elbow Performance Index and range of movement after open elbow arthrolysis?

Bone Joint J. 2021-2

[3]
Open elbow arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: an update.

Bone Jt Open. 2020-9-18

[4]
Determining the effective timing of an open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019-3-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索