Suppr超能文献

认知障碍不会导致无效表现:分析六个表现有效性测试中认知无障碍、障碍和不可信参与者的表现模式。

Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests.

机构信息

a Psychology Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System , San Antonio , TX , USA.

b Department of Psychiatry , University of Illinois College of Medicine , Chicago , IL , USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Aug;33(6):1083-1101. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1508615. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

Abstract

: Performance validity tests (PVTs) are essential in neuropsychological evaluations; however, it has been questioned how PVTs function in the context of cognitive impairment, and whether cognitive impairment alone is sufficient to cause PVT failure. Further, there is concern that some clinicians will disregard failed PVTs due to their perception that failures represent false-positive errors secondary to cognitive impairment. This study examined patterns associated with cognitively impaired versus noncredible performance across a battery of PVTs and neuropsychological tests. Additionally, the impact of VA service-connection and disability-seeking status on test validity was investigated. : A mixed-clinical sample of 103 veterans were administered six PVTs and neuropsychological tests. Performance was compared across three groups: valid-cognitively unimpaired, valid-cognitively impaired, and noncredible. : Significant PVT score differences and failure rates emerged across the three groups, with nonsignificant to small differences between valid-unimpaired and valid-impaired groups, and large differences between impaired and noncredible groups. In contrast, there were nonsignificant to small differences on neuropsychological tests between the valid-impaired and noncredible groups, indicating that impaired participants performed significantly better on PVTs despite comparable neurocognitive test scores. Service-connection rating itself was not associated with PVT failure, but an active disability claim to increase and/or establish service connection was associated with worse PVT performance. : This study supports the use of multiple PVTs during evaluations of patients with varied cognitive abilities. Results indicated increased risk of PVT failure in patients who were seeking initiation/increase in service-connected payments, and shows that cognitive impairment does not cause PVT failure.

摘要

: 性能有效性测试(PVTs)在神经心理学评估中至关重要;然而,有人质疑 PVTs 在认知障碍背景下的作用,以及仅仅认知障碍是否足以导致 PVT 失败。此外,一些临床医生可能会忽视失败的 PVT,因为他们认为失败是由于认知障碍导致的假阳性错误。本研究检查了在一系列 PVT 和神经心理学测试中,与认知受损与不可信表现相关的模式。此外,还研究了 VA 服务联系和寻求残疾状态对测试有效性的影响。 : 对 103 名退伍军人进行了混合临床样本的 6 项 PVT 和神经心理学测试。对三个组的表现进行了比较:有效的认知未受损、有效的认知受损和不可信。 : 三个组之间出现了显著的 PVT 分数差异和失败率,有效无损伤组和有效损伤组之间存在无显著差异至小差异,而损伤组和不可信组之间存在大差异。相比之下,有效损伤组和不可信组之间的神经心理学测试差异无显著差异至小差异,这表明尽管神经认知测试得分相当,受损参与者在 PVT 上的表现明显更好。服务联系评级本身与 PVT 失败无关,但积极寻求增加和/或建立服务联系的残疾索赔与更差的 PVT 表现相关。 : 本研究支持在评估具有不同认知能力的患者时使用多种 PVT。结果表明,在寻求启动/增加服务联系支付的患者中,PVT 失败的风险增加,并表明认知障碍不会导致 PVT 失败。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验