Radiation dose and image quality with new protocol in lower extremity computed tomography angiography.

PURPOSE

To compare radiation dose and image quality of lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) between cranio-caudal acquisition with single-source CT (SSCT) and flash caudo-cranial acquisition with dual-source CT (DSCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 60 patients were randomly assigned to Group A (control) or Group B (experimental) to undergo lower extremity CTA for peripheral obliterative arterial disease. Group A received protocol 1 (P1) with SSCT cranio-caudal acquisition. Group B received protocol (P2) with DSCT flash caudo-cranial acquisition. Intravascular attenuation (IVA), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image noise were compared. Two radiologists assessed the image quality. Computed tomography volume dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP) were also compared.

RESULTS

IVA with P2 was higher than with P1 (586.8 ± 140.3 vs. 496.1 ± 129.3 HU, p = 0.011), as was SNR (33.0 ± 11.3 vs. 27.4 ± 12.3; p = 0.042), CNR (30.1 ± 13.3 vs. 24.2 ± 10.3; p = 0.029) and image quality score of small arteries below the knee (3.8 ± 0.2 vs. 3.1 ± 0.2; p = 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly lower in P2 than in P1 with CTDI reduction of 40.9% (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 mGy; p = 0.006) and DLP reduction of 42.8% (148.7 ± 21.9 vs 260.2 ± 59.1 mGy * cm; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity CTA with DSCT flash caudo-cranial acquisition allows lower radiation dose with higher IVA, SNR, CNR and better image quality for small arteries below the knee than SSCT cranio-caudal acquisition.