Cook R J, Dickens B M
Faculty of Law and Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1305-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1305.
During the period between 1977 and the first quarter of 1988, 35 countries liberalized their abortion laws and four countries limited grounds for the procedure. Most legislation has extended abortion eligibility through traditional indications such as danger to maternal health or fetal handicap, but a number of other indications have been created such as adolescence, advanced maternal age, family circumstances, and AIDS or HIV infection. A number of countries have redesigned their abortion laws as part of a comprehensive package to facilitate access to and delivery of contraception, voluntary sterilization, and abortion services. Abortion litigation has increased and stimulated the liberalization of abortion provisions and the support of women's autonomous choice within the law. In Canada, the entire criminal prohibition of abortion was held unconstitutional for violating women's integrity and security. In contrast, Latin American and other constitutional developments may limit legal abortion to instances of danger to women's lives.
在1977年至1988年第一季度期间,35个国家放宽了其堕胎法律,4个国家限制了堕胎程序的适用范围。大多数立法通过诸如对孕产妇健康有危险或胎儿残疾等传统指征扩大了堕胎资格,但也产生了一些其他指征,如青春期、高龄产妇、家庭情况以及艾滋病或艾滋病毒感染。一些国家重新设计了其堕胎法律,作为一揽子综合计划的一部分,以便利获得和提供避孕、自愿绝育及堕胎服务。堕胎诉讼有所增加,并推动了堕胎条款的放宽以及在法律范围内对妇女自主选择的支持。在加拿大,对堕胎的整个刑事禁令因侵犯妇女的尊严和安全而被裁定违宪。相比之下,拉丁美洲及其他宪法发展情况可能会将合法堕胎限制在对妇女生命有危险的情形。