Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Ospedale di Cremona, Viale Concordia 1, 26100, Cremona, Italy.
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;22(2):245-254. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0901-3. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
The preferred neoadjuvant treatment for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is still matter of debate. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the different impact of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) alone.
A comprehensive search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 30th June 2018. Studies comparing survival of patients who underwent CTRT or CT alone before surgery for GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Median OS, 5-year OS, complete pathologic response (pCR), locoregional and distant failure rates were also calculated.
22 studies including 18,260 patients were considered for the final analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that combined CTRT do not significantly reduce the risk of death (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07; P = 0.41) but has a positive impact on the risk of relapse (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97; P = 0.01) compared to CT alone. Addition of RT to CT alone significantly increased the odds of pCR by 2.8 (95% CI 2.27-3.47; P < 0.001) and reduced the risk of locoregional failure (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.39-0.91; P = 0.01) but not the risk of distant metastases (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59-1.11; P = 0.19).
In this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant CTRT with CT for adenocarcinoma of GEJ, we found no difference in terms of median OS, despite a higher pCR rate and a reduced risk of locoregional recurrences for the combined approach. Further studies, preferably large randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm these results.
胃食管交界(GEJ)腺癌的首选新辅助治疗仍存在争议。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估新辅助联合化疗和放疗(CTRT)与单独化疗(CT)的不同影响。
从开始到 2018 年 6 月 30 日,我们在 EMBASE、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了全面检索。纳入比较接受 CTRT 或 CT 单独治疗后手术治疗 GEJ 腺癌患者生存情况的研究。提取总生存率(OS)的风险比(HR),并采用随机效应模型进行汇总分析。还计算了中位 OS、5 年 OS、完全病理缓解(pCR)、局部区域和远处失败率。
最终分析考虑了 22 项研究,共纳入 18260 名患者。汇总结果表明,联合 CTRT 并不能显著降低死亡风险(HR 0.95,95%CI 0.84-1.07;P=0.41),但与单独 CT 相比,对复发风险有积极影响(HR 0.85,95%CI 0.75-0.97;P=0.01)。与单独 CT 相比,RT 联合 CT 可显著增加 pCR 的几率 2.8 倍(95%CI 2.27-3.47;P<0.001),降低局部区域失败风险(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.39-0.91;P=0.01),但不降低远处转移风险(OR 0.81,95%CI 0.59-1.11;P=0.19)。
在这项比较胃食管交界腺癌新辅助 CTRT 与 CT 的系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们发现中位 OS 没有差异,尽管联合治疗方法的 pCR 率更高,局部区域复发风险更低。需要进一步的研究,最好是大型随机临床试验,以证实这些结果。