Lisciandra Chiara
Department of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2018 Dec;72:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
Behavioral economics is a field of study that is often thought of as interdisciplinary, insofar as it uses psychological insights to inform economic models. Yet the level of conceptual and methodological exchange between the two disciplines is disputed in the literature. On the one hand, behavioral economic models are often presented as psychologically informed models of individual decision-making (Camerer & Loewenstein, 2003). On the other hand, these models have often been criticized for being merely more elaborated "as if" economic models (Berg & Gigerenzer, 2010). The aim of this paper is to contribute to this debate by looking at a central topic in behavioral economics: the case of social preferences. Have findings or research methods been exchanged between psychology and economics in this research area? Have scientists with different backgrounds "travelled" across domains, thus transferring their expertise from one discipline to another? By addressing these and related questions, this paper will assess the level of knowledge transfer between psychology and economics in the study of social preferences.
行为经济学是一个常被视为跨学科的研究领域,因为它运用心理学见解来构建经济模型。然而,这两个学科之间概念和方法的交流程度在文献中存在争议。一方面,行为经济模型常被呈现为具有心理学依据的个体决策模型(卡梅拉和洛温斯坦,2003)。另一方面,这些模型常因仅仅是更精细的“仿佛”经济模型而受到批评(伯格和吉仁泽,2010)。本文的目的是通过审视行为经济学的一个核心主题:社会偏好的案例,来为这场辩论做出贡献。在这个研究领域,心理学和经济学之间是否有研究成果或研究方法的交流?具有不同背景的科学家是否“跨越”了领域,从而将他们的专业知识从一个学科转移到另一个学科?通过回答这些及相关问题,本文将评估在社会偏好研究中心理学和经济学之间的知识转移程度。