Suppr超能文献

尿失禁的手术治疗 - 我们现在在哪里?

Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence - Where are we now?

机构信息

Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia.

Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jan;54:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Abstract

Mid-urethral sling procedures (MUS) have been the surgical option of choice for most gynaecologists and urologists treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women around the world for almost 20 years, since their introduction in the late 1990s. The evidence suggests that the long-term effectiveness of the MUS is good and similar to the Burch Colposuspension and the fascial pubovaginal slings. The bulking agents are now being put forward as another minimally invasive option for the surgical treatment of SUI. Despite the increasing evidence that the retropubic MUS are more effective in long term and in high failure risk women with recurrent SUI and ISD, the TOT continues to have a high satisfaction and usage worldwide.

摘要

经阴道中段尿道悬吊术(MUS)自 20 世纪 90 年代末问世以来,近 20 年来一直是大多数妇科医生和泌尿科医生治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的首选手术方案。证据表明,MUS 的长期疗效良好,与耻骨后膀胱颈悬吊术和筋膜阴道吊带术相似。目前,膨体材料被作为治疗 SUI 的另一种微创选择。尽管越来越多的证据表明,对于长期复发 SUI 和 ISD 高失败风险的女性,经耻骨后 MUS 更为有效,但 TVT 仍在全球范围内具有较高的满意度和使用率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验