Niitsu Yoshihiro, Minami Isao, Izumiyama Hajime, Hashimoto Koshi, Yoshimoto Takanobu, Satou Fuminori, Tsujino Motoyoshi, Ota Kazuki, Kudo Atsushi, Tanabe Minoru, Yamada Tetsuya, Ogawa Yoshihiro
Department of Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Department of Preemptive Medicine and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Endocr J. 2019 Feb 28;66(2):149-155. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0353. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
Diazoxide is recognized as an effective medical treatment for insulinoma. However, due to its adverse effects, such as fluid retention, it is sometimes difficult to employ diazoxide at an effective dose in clinical practice. This study aimed to clarify the clinical factors, which may affect efficacy and safety of the diazoxide treatment. We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 20 patients with insulinoma including 4 malignant cases. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of favorable outcomes or adverse effects, and the clinical features of both groups were compared. Diazoxide was effective and ineffective in each 9 patients, respectively. In other 2 cases, the efficacy could not be determined. In the effective group, all patients had benign insulinoma. Additionally, the tumor size determined by imaging test was tended to smaller than the ineffective group but not statistically significant when malignant cases were excluded (p = 0.065). Fluid retention was observed more frequently in females than in males (p = 0.025). Five patients displayed unacceptable thrombocytopenia within a few weeks after the administration of diazoxide. In these patients, the diazoxide dose was significantly higher than that in the other patients [400 mg/day (250-500 mg/day) vs. 225 mg/day (50-425 mg/day), p = 0.027]. These findings may be informative in determining the indication and dose of diazoxide against insulinoma. In addition, a careful evaluation of platelet count would be required for a few weeks after the initiation of diazoxide treatment.
二氮嗪被公认为是治疗胰岛素瘤的一种有效药物。然而,由于其不良反应,如液体潴留,在临床实践中有时难以使用有效剂量的二氮嗪。本研究旨在阐明可能影响二氮嗪治疗疗效和安全性的临床因素。我们回顾性评估了20例胰岛素瘤患者的病历,其中包括4例恶性病例。根据是否有良好结局或不良反应将患者分为两组,并比较两组的临床特征。二氮嗪分别对9例患者有效,9例患者无效。另外2例患者的疗效无法确定。在有效组中,所有患者均为良性胰岛素瘤。此外,排除恶性病例后,影像学检查确定的肿瘤大小倾向于比无效组小,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.065)。女性比男性更常出现液体潴留(p = 0.025)。5例患者在服用二氮嗪后几周内出现不可接受的血小板减少。在这些患者中,二氮嗪剂量显著高于其他患者[400毫克/天(250 - 500毫克/天)vs. 225毫克/天(50 - 425毫克/天),p = 0.027]。这些发现可能有助于确定二氮嗪治疗胰岛素瘤的适应证和剂量。此外,在开始二氮嗪治疗后的几周内需要仔细评估血小板计数。