Suppr超能文献

局部晚期前列腺癌患者单纯放疗与放疗联合雄激素剥夺治疗的质量调整生存比较分析:采用新型决策分析方法对放射治疗肿瘤学组85-31研究的二次分析

Comparative quality-adjusted survival analysis between radiation therapy alone and radiation with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31 with novel decision analysis methods.

作者信息

Ahn Soyeon, Lee Minjung, Jeong Chang Wook

机构信息

Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Department of Statistics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Korea.

出版信息

Prostate Int. 2018 Dec;6(4):140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy in addition to radiation therapy (RT + ADT) has shown benefits in local control and progression-free survival compared with RT alone for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31. However, the survival gain may be diluted with increased toxicity of ADT. The aim of the study is to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) values between two groups.

METHODS

We developed "quality-adjusted survival analysis using duration" (QASAD) and "quality-adjusted survival analysis using probability" (QASAP) to estimate the quality-adjusted survival time. The QASAD uses the median duration in each health state to weight the utilities, whereas the QASAP uses the proportional probability of being in each state for weighting. The survival and complication rates were reconstructed based on published Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and the utility values for states were obtained from the previous literature.

RESULTS

QALYs values for RT + ADT were generally higher than those for RT. The QASAD resulted in a QALY value of 4.93 [95% bootstrapped confidence interval (CI) = 4.12-5.71] for RT and of 5.60 (95% CI = 4.30-6.48) for RT + ADT. QASAP resulted in a QALY value of 4.85 (95% CI = 4.16-5.39) for RT and 4.96 (95% CI = 3.73-5.78) for RT + ADT.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that RT + ADT provided slightly better quality-adjusted survival outcome than RT alone. The QASAD and QASAP methods may help the decision of optimal treatment balancing between survival gain and unfavorable quality of life.

摘要

背景

对于局部晚期前列腺癌患者,在放射治疗肿瘤学组85-31的研究中,与单纯放疗相比,雄激素剥夺疗法联合放疗(RT + ADT)在局部控制和无进展生存期方面显示出优势。然而,生存获益可能会因ADT毒性增加而被削弱。本研究的目的是比较两组的质量调整生命年(QALY)值。

方法

我们开发了“使用持续时间的质量调整生存分析”(QASAD)和“使用概率的质量调整生存分析”(QASAP)来估计质量调整生存时间。QASAD使用每个健康状态的中位持续时间对效用进行加权,而QASAP使用处于每个状态的比例概率进行加权。根据已发表的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线重建生存和并发症发生率,并从先前的文献中获得各状态的效用值。

结果

RT + ADT的QALY值总体上高于RT。QASAD得出RT的QALY值为4.93[95%自抽样置信区间(CI)= 4.12 - 5.71],RT + ADT为5.60(95% CI = 4.30 - 6.48)。QASAP得出RT的QALY值为4.85(95% CI = 4.16 - 5.39),RT + ADT为4.96(95% CI = 3.73 - 5.78)。

结论

我们表明,RT + ADT提供的质量调整生存结果略优于单纯RT。QASAD和QASAP方法可能有助于在生存获益和不良生活质量之间平衡的最佳治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e4/6251940/a02d5b18843b/gr1.jpg

相似文献

2
Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial.
Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2104-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61095-7. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Low rates of androgen deprivation therapy use with salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Urol Oncol. 2017 Sep;35(9):542.e25-542.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Duration of Androgen Deprivation in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Update of NRG Oncology RTOG 9202.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
3
Radiation with or without Antiandrogen Therapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):417-428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607529.
4
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0004.
7
Adverse effects of androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer and their management.
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115 Suppl 5:3-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12964.
8
Primary treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comprehensive lifetime cost-utility analysis.
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):437-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11597.x. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验