Ahn Soyeon, Lee Minjung, Jeong Chang Wook
Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Department of Statistics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Prostate Int. 2018 Dec;6(4):140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
Androgen deprivation therapy in addition to radiation therapy (RT + ADT) has shown benefits in local control and progression-free survival compared with RT alone for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31. However, the survival gain may be diluted with increased toxicity of ADT. The aim of the study is to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) values between two groups.
We developed "quality-adjusted survival analysis using duration" (QASAD) and "quality-adjusted survival analysis using probability" (QASAP) to estimate the quality-adjusted survival time. The QASAD uses the median duration in each health state to weight the utilities, whereas the QASAP uses the proportional probability of being in each state for weighting. The survival and complication rates were reconstructed based on published Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and the utility values for states were obtained from the previous literature.
QALYs values for RT + ADT were generally higher than those for RT. The QASAD resulted in a QALY value of 4.93 [95% bootstrapped confidence interval (CI) = 4.12-5.71] for RT and of 5.60 (95% CI = 4.30-6.48) for RT + ADT. QASAP resulted in a QALY value of 4.85 (95% CI = 4.16-5.39) for RT and 4.96 (95% CI = 3.73-5.78) for RT + ADT.
We showed that RT + ADT provided slightly better quality-adjusted survival outcome than RT alone. The QASAD and QASAP methods may help the decision of optimal treatment balancing between survival gain and unfavorable quality of life.
对于局部晚期前列腺癌患者,在放射治疗肿瘤学组85-31的研究中,与单纯放疗相比,雄激素剥夺疗法联合放疗(RT + ADT)在局部控制和无进展生存期方面显示出优势。然而,生存获益可能会因ADT毒性增加而被削弱。本研究的目的是比较两组的质量调整生命年(QALY)值。
我们开发了“使用持续时间的质量调整生存分析”(QASAD)和“使用概率的质量调整生存分析”(QASAP)来估计质量调整生存时间。QASAD使用每个健康状态的中位持续时间对效用进行加权,而QASAP使用处于每个状态的比例概率进行加权。根据已发表的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线重建生存和并发症发生率,并从先前的文献中获得各状态的效用值。
RT + ADT的QALY值总体上高于RT。QASAD得出RT的QALY值为4.93[95%自抽样置信区间(CI)= 4.12 - 5.71],RT + ADT为5.60(95% CI = 4.30 - 6.48)。QASAP得出RT的QALY值为4.85(95% CI = 4.16 - 5.39),RT + ADT为4.96(95% CI = 3.73 - 5.78)。
我们表明,RT + ADT提供的质量调整生存结果略优于单纯RT。QASAD和QASAP方法可能有助于在生存获益和不良生活质量之间平衡的最佳治疗决策。