Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2019 Apr;49(4):484-494. doi: 10.1111/cea.13323. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
Rush desensitization can provide short-term tolerance to individuals who are allergic to certain medications in instances where other therapeutic interventions are limited. While rush desensitization (DS) is typically successful in preventing adverse type I hypersensitivity reactions, the mechanism of allergic protection remains unknown. Given the rise in prevalence of individuals displaying multiple allergies, understanding the impact of rush DS on "bystander" allergens, or additional allergens to which an individual is sensitized, could help inform clinical recommendations.
To evaluate the effect of rush DS on bystander sensitization.
We used a murine model of rush DS, whereby BALB/c mice were sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA) and desensitized through repeated intraperitoneal injections of OVA. Using a local anaphylaxis assay, we measured ear swelling by Evans blue extravasation following intradermal challenge. In studies to measure the impact on bystander antigens, a modified protocol was used in which mice were dually sensitized to OVA and Keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), and densensitized to either OVA or KLH prior to allergic challenge.
The immunological effects of rush DS were independent of changes in Th1 and Th2 cytokine production and circulating OVA-IgE levels. Instead, rush DS resulted in subclinical degranulation of mast cells prior to challenge. In our dual sensitization model, rush DS with a single antigen conferred protection against allergic challenge to a secondary antigen. Bystander protection required prior sensitization, as DS with an irrelevant antigen did not impact allergic responsiveness.
We reveal that a key mechanism of rush DS protection against allergic responsiveness may be the subclinical degranulation of mast cells. Therefore, performing rush DS to a single antigen to which one is IgE-sensitized may be sufficient to desensitize to multiple allergens. Future studies could lead to streamlined protocols of rush DS for patients with multiple allergies.
在其他治疗干预措施有限的情况下,速发型脱敏可以为对某些药物过敏的个体提供短期耐受。虽然速发型脱敏(DS)通常能成功预防不良的 I 型超敏反应,但过敏保护的机制仍不清楚。鉴于具有多种过敏反应的个体的比例上升,了解速发型 DS 对“旁观者”过敏原或个体致敏的其他过敏原的影响,可能有助于为临床建议提供信息。
评估速发型 DS 对旁观者致敏的影响。
我们使用了一种速发型 DS 的小鼠模型,其中 BALB/c 小鼠对卵清蛋白(OVA)致敏,并通过重复腹腔内注射 OVA 进行脱敏。使用局部过敏反应测定法,通过皮内挑战后伊文思蓝外渗来测量耳朵肿胀。在测量旁观者抗原影响的研究中,使用了一种改良的方案,其中小鼠同时对 OVA 和血蓝蛋白(KLH)致敏,并在过敏挑战前对 OVA 或 KLH 进行再致敏。
速发型 DS 的免疫效应独立于 Th1 和 Th2 细胞因子产生和循环 OVA-IgE 水平的变化。相反,速发型 DS 导致挑战前肥大细胞的亚临床脱颗粒。在我们的双重致敏模型中,用单一抗原进行速发型 DS 可提供对次级抗原过敏挑战的保护。旁观者保护需要预先致敏,因为用无关抗原进行 DS 不会影响过敏反应性。
我们揭示了速发型 DS 保护免受过敏反应的一个关键机制可能是肥大细胞的亚临床脱颗粒。因此,对 IgE 致敏的单一抗原进行速发型 DS 可能足以使对多种过敏原脱敏。未来的研究可能会为具有多种过敏的患者带来速发型 DS 的简化方案。