Grupo de Estudio del Vértigo en Atención Primaria Florida, Equip d'Atenció Primària Florida Nord, Barcelona.
Equip d'Atenció Primària Florida Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona.
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):e52-e60. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X700253. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
Evidence on the effectiveness of the Epley manoeuvre in primary care is scarce.
To evaluate effectiveness at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year of a single Epley manoeuvre versus a sham manoeuvre in primary care.
Multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial in two primary care practices in Spain from November 2012 to January 2015.
Patients were ≥18 years diagnosed with subjective or objective posterior benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (vertigo only, or vertigo and nystagmus after a Dix-Hallpike test [DHT]). The intervention group received the Epley manoeuvre, and the control group received a sham manoeuvre. Betahistine was prescribed following the same regimen in both groups. The main outcome measures were the DHT result classified as negative (neither vertigo nor nystagmus) or positive. Positive results were further divided into a positive result for both vertigo and nystagmus (positive DHT with nystagmus), and a positive result for vertigo only (positive DHT without nystagmus); self-reported resolution of vertigo; and self-reported severity of vertigo evaluated on a 10-point Likert scale (10 = worst imaginable vertigo).
In total, 134 patients were randomised to either the intervention group ( = 66) or the sham group ( = 68). The intervention group showed better results in the unadjusted analyses at 1 week, with a lower rate of positive DHT with nystagmus ( = 0.022). A positive baseline DHT with nystagmus was associated with a reduction in vertigo severity (marginal effect for 10-point Likert-like question -1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.95 to -0.51) and better positive DHT rates in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.92) in the multivariate analyses.
A single Epley manoeuvre performed in primary care is an effective treatment for reversing a positive DHT and reducing vertigo severity in patients with baseline nystagmus in the DHT.
初级保健中 Epley 手法的有效性证据有限。
评估初级保健中单次 Epley 手法与假手法相比,在 1 周、1 个月和 1 年时的效果。
2012 年 11 月至 2015 年 1 月,在西班牙的两家初级保健诊所进行的多中心、双盲随机对照试验。
患者年龄≥18 岁,诊断为主观性或客观性后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(眩晕或 Dix-Hallpike 试验后出现眩晕和眼球震颤[DHT])。干预组接受 Epley 手法,对照组接受假手法。两组均按相同方案开倍他司汀。主要结局指标为 DHT 结果分类为阴性(无眩晕也无眼球震颤)或阳性。阳性结果进一步分为眩晕和眼球震颤均为阳性(阳性 DHT 伴眼球震颤)和仅为眩晕阳性(阳性 DHT 无眼球震颤);眩晕自我报告缓解;以及 10 分 Likert 量表评估的眩晕严重程度自我报告(10=最严重的可想象的眩晕)。
共纳入 134 例患者,随机分为干预组(n=66)或假手法组(n=68)。在未经调整的分析中,干预组在 1 周时的结果更好,阳性 DHT 伴眼球震颤的发生率较低(=0.022)。阳性 DHT 伴眼球震颤的基线与眩晕严重程度降低相关(Likert 样问题 10 分的边缘效应为-1.73,95%置信区间[CI]为-2.95 至-0.51),且在多变量分析中,干预组的阳性 DHT 率更高(调整比值比 0.09,95%CI 为 0.01 至 0.92)。
初级保健中单次 Epley 手法是治疗伴有基线 DHT 时眼球震颤的患者,逆转阳性 DHT 和降低眩晕严重程度的有效方法。