Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Aggress Behav. 2019 Mar;45(2):151-160. doi: 10.1002/ab.21804. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Research has implicated biased attention allocation toward emotional cues as a proximal mechanism in the association between trait disinhibition and physical aggression. The current study tested this putative cognitive mechanism by incentivizing a shift of attention from a provoking stimulus to a neutral stimulus during a laboratory aggression paradigm. Participants were 119 undergraduate men. They completed a questionnaire that assessed trait disinhibition, were randomly assigned to a distraction or no-distraction control condition, and completed a shock-based aggression task in which they received low and high provocation from a fictitious opponent. A significant positive association between trait disinhibition and physical aggression was found among non-distracted participants exposed to high, but not low, provocation. Distraction from provoking cues significantly attenuated this association. This study is among the first to provide experimental evidence of (a) the positive relation between trait disinhibition and laboratory-based physical aggression, and (b) a potential method for attenuating this association.
研究表明,对情绪线索的有偏差的注意力分配是特质冲动性与身体攻击之间关联的一个近因机制。本研究通过在实验室攻击范式中激励注意力从挑衅性刺激转移到中性刺激,来检验这种假设的认知机制。参与者是 119 名本科男性。他们完成了一份问卷,评估了特质冲动性,被随机分配到分心或无分心控制条件,并完成了一项基于电击的攻击任务,在任务中他们从一个虚构的对手那里受到低和高的挑衅。在受到高挑衅而非低挑衅的非分心参与者中,发现特质冲动性与身体攻击之间存在显著的正相关。对挑衅线索的分心显著减弱了这种关联。这项研究是首次提供实验证据,证明了(a)特质冲动性与基于实验室的身体攻击之间的正相关,以及(b)一种减弱这种关联的潜在方法。