Osman Mohamed Waseem, Nath Mintu, Khalil Asma, Webb David R, Robinson Thompson G, Mousa Hatem A
Clinical Research Fellow, University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Senior Biomedical Statistician, University Hospitals of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Oct;14:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
To assess the changes in haemodynamics amongst pregnant women who were screened for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in comparison to low-risk healthy pregnant controls.
A total of 120 pregnant women of mean (standard deviation) age 31.03 (5.41) years who attended their oral glucose tolerance test as part of the national screening for GDM (study), and 60 low-risk healthy pregnant women (control) of mean age 29.71 (5.33) years, were invited to participate in this study. All women included in the study booked at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and fulfilled the relevant inclusion criteria. Non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness and cardiac output were undertaken on participants between 26 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. The mean difference between GDM and low-risk group for each of the arterial stiffness and cardiac output measurements was assessed by a two-sample unpaired t-test.
Significant differences were found between the study and control groups for brachial (-64.5 vs. -69.5, p < 0.04) and aortic augmentation indices (5.2 vs. 2.7, p = 0.04), though there was no significant difference for PWV (8.3 vs. 8.1, p = 0.49). Cardiac output (7.6 vs. 7.0, p = 0.011), stroke volume (84.4 vs. 76.9, p = 0.013) and central mean arterial pressure (71 vs. 58, <0.001) were also significantly different between groups. However, no significant differences were reported for heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, or total peripheral resistance.
Pregnant women at risk of GDM between gestational weeks 26 and 28 had significantly increased measures of arterial stiffness, as assessed by brachial and aortic augmentation indices, compared with low-risk healthy controls. Whether these women are at greater long-term cardiovascular disease risk warrants further investigation.
评估接受妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)筛查的孕妇与低风险健康孕妇对照组之间的血流动力学变化。
共有120名平均(标准差)年龄为31.03(5.41)岁的孕妇作为国家GDM筛查的一部分参加了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(研究组),以及60名平均年龄为29.71(5.33)岁的低风险健康孕妇(对照组)被邀请参加本研究。所有纳入研究的女性均在莱斯特大学医院国民保健服务信托基金登记,并符合相关纳入标准。在妊娠26至28周期间对参与者进行动脉僵硬度和心输出量的无创评估。通过两样本非配对t检验评估GDM组和低风险组在每个动脉僵硬度和心输出量测量值之间的平均差异。
研究组和对照组在肱动脉(-64.5对-69.5,p<0.04)和主动脉增强指数(5.2对2.7,p=0.04)方面存在显著差异,尽管脉搏波速度无显著差异(8.3对8.1,p=0.49)。两组在心输出量(7.6对7.0,p=0.011)、每搏输出量(84.4对76.9,p=0.013)和中心平均动脉压(71对58,<0.001)方面也存在显著差异。然而,心率、收缩压和舒张压或总外周阻力方面未报告显著差异。
与低风险健康对照组相比,妊娠26至28周有GDM风险的孕妇通过肱动脉和主动脉增强指数评估的动脉僵硬度测量值显著增加。这些女性是否面临更大的长期心血管疾病风险值得进一步研究。