Dewitte Ken, Claeys Marc, Van Craenenbroeck Emeline, Monsieurs Koen, Heidbuchel Hein, Hoymans Vicky, Stoop Tibor
Antwerp University Hospital, Emergency Department, Belgium.
Antwerp University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Belgium.
Pathophysiology. 2019 Mar;26(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
We explored the effect of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) on endothelial function and on circulating mediators.
In 20 healthy male volunteers (mean age 31 ± 10 years), flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was measured before and after 20 min of arm ischaemia, followed by reperfusion. Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) was performed by applying 3 cycles of 5 min of ischaemia of the leg at the onset of index arm ischaemia. Each volunteer underwent the IR-induced vascular injury protocol with and without RIC in a crossover study design. In the control group, IR significantly reduced FMD (5.9 ± 2.9% before IR vs. 2.2 ± 3.7% after IR; p < 0.001). This effect was significantly attenuated by performing RIC (FMD of 5.5 ± 3.1% before IR vs. 4.0 ± 3.4% % after IR; p for interaction = 0.01). Serum levels of SOD and ADMA increased significantly whereas MCP-1 and VEGF levels decreased significantly. Only changes in SOD levels were significantly related to the degree of RIC induced protection (r² = 0.34; p = 0.018).
RIC has protective effects against endothelial IR injury. Our biomarker study suggests that anti-oxidative stress mediators, such as SOD, seem to be more involved in the pathogenesis of RIC-induced protection in humans than angiogenesis factors or chemo-attractant cytokines.
我们探讨了远程缺血预处理(RIC)对内皮功能和循环介质的影响。
在20名健康男性志愿者(平均年龄31±10岁)中,测量了手臂缺血20分钟并随后再灌注前后的血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)。在手臂缺血开始时,通过对腿部进行3个周期、每个周期5分钟的缺血来进行远程缺血预处理(RIC)。在交叉研究设计中,每位志愿者分别接受了有和没有RIC的IR诱导的血管损伤方案。在对照组中,IR显著降低了FMD(IR前为5.9±2.9%,IR后为2.2±3.7%;p<0.001)。通过进行RIC,这种效应得到了显著减弱(IR前FMD为5.5±3.1%,IR后为4.0±3.4%;交互作用p=0.01)。血清中超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)水平显著升高,而单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平显著降低。只有SOD水平的变化与RIC诱导的保护程度显著相关(r²=0.34;p=0.018)。
RIC对内皮IR损伤具有保护作用。我们的生物标志物研究表明,与血管生成因子或趋化因子细胞因子相比,抗氧化应激介质如SOD似乎在人类RIC诱导的保护发病机制中发挥了更大作用。