Charak Ruby, DiLillo David, Messman-Moore Terri L, Gratz Kim L
Department of Psychological Science, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, TX, U.S.A.
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, U.S.A.
Psychol Violence. 2018 Sep;8(5):570-579. doi: 10.1037/vio0000154. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
The aims of the present study were to investigate latent classes of sexual victimization among young adult women based on characteristics of their victimization experiences (e.g., relationship with the perpetrator, nature of act, frequency), and examine differences in dimensions of emotion dysregulation across these classes and among non-victims.
Participants were 491 women in the age range of 18-25 years from the United States; of these, 335 participants ( = 22.0, = 2.22) reported at least one experience of sexual victimization during their lifetime. Latent class analysis was employed to identify groups of women based on characteristics of their sexual victimization experiences.
A three-class solution was found to be most parsimonious. The classes were labeled as (DRV; 43.3%), (CASA: 20.3%), and (ASA; 36.4%). The DRV class reported higher rates of penetrative abuse and longer duration of abuse than the CASA class, and higher rates of injury during assault than the ASA class. Further, the DRV class reported greater difficulties in three dimensions of emotion regulation than the ASA class and greater deficits in emotional clarity than the CASA class. Finally, the three latent classes reported greater difficulties in at least four dimensions of emotion regulation than the non-victimized group.
Findings of different classes of sexual victimization suggest the multidimensionality of these experiences. Results also highlight the potential utility of interventions aimed at improving emotion regulation among women with severe childhood sexual abuse.
本研究旨在根据年轻成年女性性侵害经历的特征(如与犯罪者的关系、行为性质、频率)调查性侵害的潜在类别,并检验这些类别之间以及与非受害者相比在情绪失调维度上的差异。
参与者为来自美国的491名年龄在18至25岁之间的女性;其中,335名参与者( = 22.0, = 2.22)报告在其一生中至少有一次性侵害经历。采用潜在类别分析根据她们性侵害经历的特征来识别女性群体。
发现一个三类解决方案最为简约。这些类别被标记为(DRV;43.3%)、(CASA:20.3%)和(ASA;36.4%)。DRV类别报告的穿透性虐待发生率和虐待持续时间高于CASA类别,袭击期间的受伤率高于ASA类别。此外,DRV类别在情绪调节的三个维度上报告的困难比ASA类别更大,在情绪清晰度方面的缺陷比CASA类别更大。最后,这三个潜在类别在至少四个情绪调节维度上报告的困难比未受侵害组更大。
不同性侵害类别的研究结果表明这些经历具有多维度性。结果还突出了旨在改善有严重童年性虐待经历女性情绪调节的干预措施的潜在效用。