Quintanilha Júlia Coelho França, Duarte Natalia da Costa, Lloret Gustavo Rafaini, Visacri Marília Berlofa, Mattos Karen Prado Herzer, Dragosavac Desanka, Falcão Antonio Luis Eiras, Moriel Patricia
School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, 13083-887, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Cândido Portinari 200, 13083-871, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):74-80. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0766-x. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
Background The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria related to nosocomial infections is a growing worldwide problem, and polymyxins have become important due to the lack of new antibiotics. Objectives To evaluate the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic impact of using colistin and polymyxin B to treat nosocomial infections. Setting Neurosurgical, cardiovascular, or transplantation intensive care unit (ICU) at the Clinical Hospital of the University of Campinas (São Paulo, Brazil). Method A retrospective cohort study was conduct in patients in the ICU. The renal function was determined daily during treatment by measuring the serum creatinine. A cost minimization analysis was performed to compare the relative costs of treatment with colistin and polymyxin B. Main outcomes measure The outcomes were 30-day mortality and frequency and onset of nephrotoxicity after beginning treatment. Results Fifty-one patients treated with colistin and 51 with polymyxin B were included. 30-day mortality was observed in 25.49% and 33.33% of patients treated with colistin and polymyxin B, respectively; Nephrotoxicity was observed in 43.14% and 54.90% of patients in colistin and polymyxin B groups, respectively; and onset time of nephrotoxicity was 9.86 ± 13.22 days for colistin and 10.68 ± 9.93 days for polymyxin B group. Colistin treatment had a lower cost per patient compared to the cost for polymyxin B treatment (USD $13,389.37 vs. USD $13,639.16, respectively). Conclusion We found no difference between 30-day mortality and nephrotoxicity between groups; however, colistin proved to be the best option from a pharmacoeconomic point of view.
与医院感染相关的多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌的出现和迅速传播是一个日益严重的全球性问题,由于缺乏新的抗生素,多粘菌素变得愈发重要。目的:评估使用黏菌素和多粘菌素B治疗医院感染的疗效及药物经济学影响。地点:坎皮纳斯大学临床医院(巴西圣保罗)的神经外科、心血管或移植重症监护病房(ICU)。方法:对ICU患者进行回顾性队列研究。治疗期间每天通过测量血清肌酐来确定肾功能。进行成本最小化分析以比较黏菌素和多粘菌素B治疗的相对成本。主要结局指标:结局为30天死亡率以及开始治疗后肾毒性的发生率和发生时间。结果:纳入51例接受黏菌素治疗的患者和51例接受多粘菌素B治疗的患者。接受黏菌素和多粘菌素B治疗的患者中,30天死亡率分别为25.49%和33.33%;黏菌素组和多粘菌素B组分别有43.14%和54.90%的患者出现肾毒性;黏菌素组肾毒性的发生时间为9.86±13.22天,多粘菌素B组为10.68±9.93天。与多粘菌素B治疗的成本相比,黏菌素治疗的人均成本更低(分别为13389.37美元和13639.16美元)。结论:我们发现两组之间30天死亡率和肾毒性无差异;然而,从药物经济学角度来看,黏菌素被证明是最佳选择。