Baek Min Seong, Kim Se Hoon, Lee Young Mock
Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Jan;60(1):98-105. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.1.98.
The disease entity mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) is characterized by an early onset of stroke-like episodes. MELAS is the most dominant subtype of mitochondrial disease. Molecular genetic testing is important in the diagnosis of MELAS. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) 3243A>G mutation is found in 80% of MELAS patients. Nevertheless, molecular analysis alone may be insufficient to diagnose MELAS because of mtDNA heteroplasmy. This study aimed to evaluate whether muscle biopsy is useful in MELAS patients as an initial diagnostic evaluation method.
The medical records of patients who were diagnosed with MELAS at the Department of Pediatrics of Gangnam Severance Hospital between January 2006 and January 2017 were reviewed. The study population included 12 patients. They were divided into two subgroups according to whether the results of muscle pathology were in accordance with mitochondrial diseases. Clinical variables, diagnostic evaluations, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Of the 12 patients, seven were muscle pathology-positive for mitochondrial disease. No statistically significant difference in clinical data was observed between the groups that were muscle pathology-positive and muscle pathology-negative for mtDNA 3243A>G mutation. Additionally, the patients with weakness as the initial symptom were all muscle pathology-positive.
The usefulness of muscle biopsy appears to be limited to an initial confirmative diagnostic evaluation of MELAS. Muscle biopsy can provide some information in MELAS patients with weakness not confirmed by genetic testing.
疾病实体线粒体脑肌病伴乳酸酸中毒及卒中样发作(MELAS)的特征是卒中样发作早发。MELAS是线粒体疾病最主要的亚型。分子遗传学检测对MELAS的诊断很重要。80%的MELAS患者存在线粒体DNA(mtDNA)3243A>G突变。然而,由于mtDNA异质性,仅靠分子分析可能不足以诊断MELAS。本研究旨在评估肌肉活检作为MELAS患者初始诊断评估方法是否有用。
回顾了2006年1月至2017年1月在江南Severance医院儿科诊断为MELAS的患者的病历。研究人群包括12例患者。根据肌肉病理学结果是否符合线粒体疾病将他们分为两个亚组。比较两组之间的临床变量、诊断评估和临床结局。
12例患者中,7例肌肉病理学检查显示线粒体疾病阳性。mtDNA 3243A>G突变的肌肉病理学阳性组和阴性组之间在临床数据上未观察到统计学显著差异。此外,以肌无力为初始症状的患者均为肌肉病理学阳性。
肌肉活检的有用性似乎仅限于对MELAS进行初始确诊诊断评估。肌肉活检可为基因检测未确诊的肌无力MELAS患者提供一些信息。