Quarrington Ryan D, Costi John J, Freeman Brian J C, Jones Claire F
School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Spinal Research Group, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Biomechanics and Implants Research Group, The Medical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
J Biomech. 2019 Jan 23;83:205-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.047. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
The subaxial cervical facets are important load-bearing structures, yet little is known about their mechanical response during physiological or traumatic intervertebral motion. Facet loading likely increases when intervertebral motions are superimposed with axial compression forces, increasing the risk of facet fracture. The aim of this study was to measure the mechanical response of the facets when intervertebral axial compression or distraction is superimposed on constrained, non-destructive shear, bending and rotation motions. Twelve C6/C7 motion segments (70 ± 13 yr, nine male) were subjected to constrained quasi-static anterior shear (1 mm), axial rotation (4°), flexion (10°), and lateral bending (5°) motions. Each motion was superimposed with three axial conditions: (1) 50 N compression; (2) 300 N compression (simulating neck muscle contraction); and, (3) 2.5 mm distraction. Angular deflections, and principal and shear surface strains, of the bilateral C6 inferior facets were calculated from motion-capture data and rosette strain gauges, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models (α = 0.05) assessed the effect of axial condition. Minimum principal and maximum shear strains were largest in the compressed condition for all motions except for maximum principal strains during axial rotation. For right axial rotation, maximum principal strains were larger for the contralateral facets, and minimum principal strains were larger for the left facets, regardless of axial condition. Sagittal deflections were largest in the compressed conditions during anterior shear and lateral bending motions, when adjusted for facet side.
下颈椎小关节是重要的承重结构,但对于其在生理或创伤性椎间运动过程中的力学响应却知之甚少。当椎间运动与轴向压缩力叠加时,小关节负荷可能会增加,从而增加小关节骨折的风险。本研究的目的是测量在椎间轴向压缩或牵张叠加于受限、非破坏性剪切、弯曲和旋转运动时小关节的力学响应。对12个C6/C7运动节段(70±13岁,9名男性)施加受限准静态前向剪切(1mm)、轴向旋转(4°)、屈曲(10°)和侧弯(5°)运动。每种运动均叠加三种轴向条件:(1)50N压缩;(2)300N压缩(模拟颈部肌肉收缩);以及(3)2.5mm牵张。分别根据运动捕捉数据和应变片计算双侧C6下关节面的角偏转、主应变和剪应变。线性混合效应模型(α=0.05)评估轴向条件的影响。除轴向旋转时的最大主应变外,所有运动在压缩条件下的最小主应变和最大剪应变均最大。对于右侧轴向旋转,无论轴向条件如何,对侧关节面的最大主应变较大,左侧关节面的最小主应变较大。在前向剪切和侧弯运动中,调整关节面侧别后,矢状面偏转在压缩条件下最大。