Tickner Anthony, Thorng Seiha, Martin Mary, Marmolejo Valerie
Podiatric Surgical Attending, Saint Vincent Hospital/Worcester Medical Center PM&S 36 Surgical Residency Program, Worcester, MA.
Staff Podiatrist, Sutter Gould Medical Group, Stockton, CA.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Mar;58(2):213-220. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
Rupture of the tibialis anterior tendon is a rare condition reported to occur most often spontaneously in patients >45 years of age. Diagnosis is often delayed due to transient pain at the time of rupture and the ability of the long extensors to compensate for the lost action of the tibialis anterior. Treatment has been proposed to be based on the activity level of the individual; however, no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment modality for this rare condition. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine outcomes obtained with conservative and surgical management. Twenty-four references (155 cases) were identified. Conservative management (21 cases, 13.55%) was associated with poorer outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.68; I = 61%) because of pain and functional limitations related to ankle dorsiflexory weakness. Surgical intervention (134 cases, 86.45%) had a better chance for good outcome (OR 8.40; I = 63%). Use of an ipsilateral split/turn-down ipsilateral tibialis anterior tendon graft (OR 32.15; I = 0%) semitendinous autograft (OR 15.25; I = 44%), or direct repair (OR 12.57; I = 0%) provided the best postoperative outcomes, whereas extensor hallucis longus autograft was associated with the worst (OR 0.27, I = 34%). The most common postoperative finding was objective mild dorsiflexory weakness (4/5 muscle strength), which did not translate to subjective functional limitation. Good functional results were found to occur regardless of patient age at the time of intervention. Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that surgical intervention provides better functional outcomes than conservative management. Use of an extensor hallucis longus autograft is not recommended if surgical intervention is performed.
胫骨前肌腱断裂是一种罕见病症,据报道最常自发发生于45岁以上患者。由于断裂时的短暂疼痛以及长伸肌能够代偿胫骨前肌丧失的功能,诊断往往会延迟。治疗方案建议根据个体的活动水平制定;然而,对于这种罕见病症的最佳治疗方式尚未达成共识。进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定保守治疗和手术治疗的效果。共纳入24篇参考文献(155例病例)。保守治疗(21例,13.55%)因与踝关节背屈无力相关的疼痛和功能受限,预后较差(优势比[OR]0.68;I²=61%)。手术干预(134例,86.45%)获得良好预后的机会更大(OR 8.40;I²=63%)。使用同侧劈开/翻转的同侧胫骨前肌腱移植物(OR 32.15;I²=0%)、半腱肌自体移植物(OR 15.25;I²=44%)或直接修复(OR 12.57;I²=0%)术后效果最佳,而拇长伸肌自体移植物的效果最差(OR 0.27,I²=34%)。最常见的术后表现是客观上轻度的背屈无力(肌力4/5),但这并未转化为主观功能受限。无论干预时患者年龄如何,均发现有良好的功能结果。该系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,手术干预比保守治疗能提供更好的功能结局。如果进行手术干预,不建议使用拇长伸肌自体移植物。