Suppr超能文献

改善抗菌药物处方:与一线和二线处方相关的多变量模型识别因素。

Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Multinomial Model Identifying Factors Associated With First- and Second-Line Prescribing.

机构信息

Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.

Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC), Dublin, Ireland; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 May;20(5):624-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Broad-spectrum, second-line antimicrobials may be prescribed when initial first-line options prove ineffective. This study compares prescribing practices and identifies potential influencing factors for first- and second-line antimicrobials in long-term care facilities.

DESIGN

Point prevalence survey of health care-associated infections and antimicrobial use in long-term care facilities (HALT), expanded by additional data collection.

SETTING

Long-term care facilities in Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

Of long-term care facilities that participated in the HALT study 2016, additional data provided by 77 facilities with a record of 3677 residents.

MEASUREMENT

On the survey date, an institutional questionnaire was completed by each participating long-term care facility, and resident questionnaires were completed only for those residents who met a health care-associated infection surveillance definition and/or were prescribed a systemic antimicrobial. All participating long-term care facilities were contacted at a later time point to provide limited anonymized data (age, sex, urinary catheterization, and disorientation) on all current residents. These additional data were matched to the original data set, facilitating multilevel multinominal logistic regression (first-line/second-line/no antimicrobial).

RESULTS

Of 3677 residents in 77 long-term care facilities, 381 (10%) were prescribed systemic antimicrobials on the survey day. Of those, 46% were categorized as second-line choices, with substantial interfacility variation observed with regard to prescription of first- versus second-line antimicrobials. The odds of a second-line antimicrobial prescription for a resident doubled when comparing the highest with the lowest prescribing long-term care facilities (median odds ratio = 2.0, credibility interval = 1.5-2.9). Male residents were less often prescribed first-line antimicrobials [odds ratio (OR) = 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.4-0.9, P = .02]. Long-term care facilities that reported the provision of education on antimicrobial prescribing use significantly less second-line antimicrobials (OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1-0.7, P = .02). Females and residents with a urinary catheter were more likely to receive first-line antimicrobials.

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: The use of second-line antimicrobials is common practice in long-term care facilities, but education and training on appropriate antimicrobial use has the potential to reduce second-line antimicrobial prescribing, improve patients' outcomes, and reduce antimicrobial resistance.

摘要

背景/目的:当最初的一线选择无效时,可能会开出广谱二线抗生素。本研究比较了长期护理机构中一线和二线抗生素的处方实践,并确定了潜在的影响因素。

设计

在爱尔兰长期护理机构进行的医疗保健相关性感染和抗生素使用的点患病率调查(HALT),并通过额外的数据收集进行了扩展。

设置

爱尔兰的长期护理机构。

参与者

参加 2016 年 HALT 研究的长期护理机构中,有 77 家提供了额外数据,这些数据记录了 3677 名居民。

测量

在调查日,每个参与的长期护理机构都完成了一份机构问卷,只有符合医疗保健相关性感染监测定义并/或开了全身抗生素的居民才完成居民问卷。稍后,所有参与的长期护理机构都被联系提供当前所有居民的有限匿名数据(年龄、性别、导尿管和定向障碍)。这些额外的数据与原始数据集相匹配,促进了多层次多项逻辑回归(一线/二线/无抗生素)。

结果

在 77 家长期护理机构的 3677 名居民中,有 381 名(10%)在调查日开了全身抗生素。其中,46%被归类为二线选择,观察到不同机构之间在开一线与二线抗生素方面存在很大差异。将最高与最低处方长期护理机构进行比较,居民接受二线抗生素处方的几率增加了一倍(中位数优势比=2.0,置信区间=1.5-2.9)。男性居民开一线抗生素的可能性较低[比值比(OR)=0.6,95%置信区间(CI)=0.4-0.9,P=0.02]。报告提供抗生素处方使用教育的长期护理机构使用的二线抗生素明显较少(OR=0.2,95%CI=0.1-0.7,P=0.02)。女性和有导尿管的居民更有可能接受一线抗生素。

结论/意义:长期护理机构中使用二线抗生素是常见做法,但适当使用抗生素的教育和培训有可能减少二线抗生素的处方,改善患者的结局,并减少抗生素耐药性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验