Suppr超能文献

剧烈体力活动引发的急性冠状动脉闭塞。

Triggering of Acute Coronary Occlusion by Episodes of Vigorous Physical Exertion.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Dec;28(12):1773-1779. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing recognition that heavy exertion can occasionally trigger an acute myocardial infarction (MI), although some uncertainties exist regarding the link. The primary aim of this study was to compare the relative risk (RR) of MI following vigorous exertion between those with confirmed coronary occlusion and those with a non-occluded culprit artery on acute angiography. Secondary aims were to determine if the risk of coronary occlusion is modified by the type of exercise (dynamic or isometric resistance), the frequency of regular exertion or whether the exertion was emotionally charged.

METHODS

Seven hundred sixty-two (762) participants with MI (410 with coronary occlusion TIMI 0,1), and 352 (46%) with a non-occluded culprit artery (TIMI 2,3) completed a questionnaire within 4days of admission, detailing episodes of physical exertion in the 28hours prior to symptom onset and the usual frequency of such exertion. Exertion exposures within 1hour prior to symptom onset were compared to subjects' usual yearly exposure, with case-crossover methodology.

RESULTS

The RR of symptom onset following heavy physical exertion level ≥6 (exertion scale 1-8), was higher in those with TIMI 0,1 compared to those with TIMI 2,3 flow (RR 6.30, 95% CI 4.70-8.50 vs 3.93, 2.89-5.30). The increased risk of coronary occlusion following vigorous exertion was observed following both dynamic exertion and isometric resistance, and did not differ between exertion types. The highest risk of coronary occlusion following exertion was observed in those who were sedentary (regular vigorous exertion <1day weekly) (RR=77, 95% CI 46-132), whereas in those who frequently perform regular vigorous physical exertion (>4days weekly), the RR of symptom onset during exertion was significantly lower, RR 2.3 (95% CI 1.5-3.6). There was no significant difference in relative risk based on whether the exertion was reported as emotionally charged.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative risk that heavy exertion will trigger a non-fatal MI with an occluded artery is greater than for a non-occluded culprit artery. Both dynamic and isometric exertion increase the relative risk of event, while exposure to regular vigorous exertion reduces the relative risk.

摘要

背景

人们越来越认识到剧烈运动偶尔会引发急性心肌梗死(MI),尽管两者之间的联系仍存在一些不确定性。本研究的主要目的是比较在急性血管造影中确认冠状动脉闭塞和非闭塞罪犯动脉的患者剧烈运动后 MI 的相对风险(RR)。次要目的是确定运动类型(动态或等长阻力)、规律运动的频率以及运动是否情绪激动是否会改变冠状动脉闭塞的风险。

方法

762 名 MI 患者(410 名冠状动脉闭塞 TIMI 0、1)和 352 名(46%)非闭塞罪犯动脉(TIMI 2、3)的患者在入院后 4 天内完成了一份问卷,详细描述了症状发作前 28 小时内的身体活动发作情况以及此类活动的通常频率。使用病例交叉方法比较了症状发作前 1 小时内的活动暴露与患者的通常每年暴露。

结果

与 TIMI 2、3 血流相比,TIMI 0、1 患者中症状发作后剧烈体力活动水平≥6(活动量表 1-8)的 RR 更高(RR 6.30,95%CI 4.70-8.50 比 3.93,2.89-5.30)。观察到剧烈运动后冠状动脉闭塞的风险增加发生在动态运动和等长阻力之后,且两种运动类型之间没有差异。在久坐(规律剧烈运动每周<1 天)的患者中,运动后发生冠状动脉闭塞的风险最高(RR=77,95%CI 46-132),而在经常进行规律剧烈体力活动(每周>4 天)的患者中,RR 运动期间症状发作的 RR 明显降低,RR 2.3(95%CI 1.5-3.6)。根据运动是否被报告为情绪激动,相对风险没有显著差异。

结论

剧烈运动引发闭塞性冠状动脉非致命性 MI 的相对风险大于非闭塞性罪犯动脉。动态和等长运动都会增加事件的相对风险,而经常进行剧烈运动则会降低相对风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验