Alvarenga Bruno A P, Fujikawa Ricardo, João Filipa, Lara Jerusa P R, Veloso António P
Biomechanics and Functional Morphology Laboratory, Faculty of Human Kinetics, FMH, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Department of Chiropractic, Real Centro Universitario Escorial - Maria Cristina, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Nov 28;4(1):e000389. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000389. eCollection 2018.
Musculoskeletal disorders in athletes, including spinal biomechanical dysfunctions, are believed to negatively influence symmetry. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recognised as a safe and effective treatment for musculoskeletal disorders, but there is little evidence about whether it can be beneficial in symmetry. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effects of lumbar SMT in symmetry.
Forty asymptomatic athletes participated in the study. The randomisation procedure was performed according to the following group allocation: group 1 (SMT) and group 2 (SHAM). Each participant completed a physical activity questionnaire, and also underwent clinical and physical evaluation for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Statistical significance (P<0.05) between groups and types of therapy were calculated by physical performance tests symmetry (static position, squat and counter movement jump (CMJ), pre- and post-SMT and SHAM. There were 14 trials of three symmetry tests for each participant, for a total of 560 trials.
Lumbar SMT produced immediate effects in symmetry in the static position; however, the same effects were not found in squat and CMJ on symmetry 1. Therefore, our results showed a significant difference in pre- (mean 16.3%) and post-lumbar SMT (mean 3.7%) in static symmetry. However, symmetry 2 showed no statistical significant differences for any of the tests and intervention groups. No statistically significant effects in symmetry pre- to post-SHAM were found in any of the tests.
Statistically significant differences were found in lumbar SMT, but only for static symmetry. These findings suggest that SMT was effective in producing immediate effects in symmetry in the static position, but none in dynamic tests. Future studies could address our study's limitations.
NCT03361592.
运动员的肌肉骨骼疾病,包括脊柱生物力学功能障碍,被认为会对身体对称性产生负面影响。脊柱手法治疗(SMT)被公认为是治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的一种安全有效的方法,但关于其是否对身体对称性有益的证据很少。因此,本研究旨在测量腰椎SMT对身体对称性的影响。
40名无症状运动员参与了本研究。随机化程序按照以下分组方式进行:第1组(SMT组)和第2组(假治疗组)。每位参与者完成一份体育活动问卷,并根据入选标准接受临床和身体评估以确定是否符合条件。通过身体性能测试对称性(静态姿势、深蹲和反向移动跳(CMJ))计算SMT组和假治疗组之间以及不同治疗类型之间的统计学显著性(P<0.05),测试在SMT和假治疗前后进行。每位参与者进行了三项对称性测试,共14次试验,总计560次试验。
腰椎SMT在静态姿势下对身体对称性产生了即时影响;然而,在深蹲和CMJ测试中未发现对身体对称性有同样的影响。因此,我们的结果显示,腰椎SMT前后静态对称性存在显著差异(术前平均为16.3%,术后平均为3.7%)。然而,对称性2在任何测试和干预组中均未显示出统计学显著差异。在任何测试中,假治疗前后的身体对称性均未发现有统计学显著影响。
腰椎SMT存在统计学显著差异,但仅在静态对称性方面。这些发现表明,SMT在产生静态姿势下身体对称性的即时影响方面是有效的,但在动态测试中无效。未来的研究可以解决本研究的局限性。
NCT03361592。