Sullivan Holli-Joi, Readmond Carolyn, Radicella Christina, Persad Victoria, Fasano Thomas J, Wu Chun
Chemistry & Biochemistry and Department of Molecular & Cellular Biosciences, College of Science and Mathematics, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey 08028, United States.
ACS Omega. 2018 Nov 30;3(11):14788-14806. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01574. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
A promising anticancer therapeutic strategy is the stabilization of telomeric G-quadruplexes using G-quadruplex-binding small molecules. Although many G-quadruplex-specific ligands have been developed, their low potency and selectivity to G-quadruplexes over duplex remains unsolved. Recently, a crystal structure of a telomeric 3' quadruplex-duplex hybrid was reported and the quadruplex-duplex interface was suggested to a good target to address the issues. However, there are no high-resolution complex structures reported for G-quadruplex ligands except for a docked BSU6037. In this study, molecular dynamic (MD) binding simulations with a free ligand were used to study binding poses and dynamics of four representative ligands: telomestatin, TMPyP4, BSU6037, and BRACO19. The MD data showed that BSU6037 was able to fully intercalate into the interface whereas TMPyP4 and BRACO19 could only maintain partial intercalation into the interface and telomestatin only binds at the quadruplex and duplex ends. Both linear ligands, BSU6037 and BRACO19, were able to interact with the interface, yet they were not selective over duplex DNA. The DNA geometry, binding modes, and binding pathways were systematically characterized, and the binding energy was calculated and compared for each system. The interaction of the ligands to the interface was by the means of an induced-fit binding mechanism rather than a lock-key mechanism, consisting of the DNA unfolding at the interface to allow entrance of the drug and then the refolding and repacking of the DNA and the ligand to further stabilize the G-quadruplex. On the basis of the findings in this study, modifications were suggested to optimize the interface binding for TMPyp4 and telomestatin.
一种很有前景的抗癌治疗策略是使用与G-四链体结合的小分子来稳定端粒G-四链体。尽管已经开发出许多G-四链体特异性配体,但它们对G-四链体的效力较低,且相对于双链体缺乏选择性,这一问题仍未解决。最近,有报道称端粒3'四链体-双链体杂合体的晶体结构,并且四链体-双链体界面被认为是解决这些问题的一个良好靶点。然而,除了对接的BSU6037外,尚未有关于G-四链体配体的高分辨率复合物结构报道。在本研究中,使用自由配体的分子动力学(MD)结合模拟来研究四种代表性配体(端粒抑素、TMPyP4、BSU6037和BRACO19)的结合姿势和动力学。MD数据表明,BSU6037能够完全插入界面,而TMPyP4和BRACO19只能部分插入界面,端粒抑素仅在四链体和双链体末端结合。两种线性配体BSU6037和BRACO19都能够与界面相互作用,但它们对双链DNA没有选择性。系统地表征了DNA的几何形状、结合模式和结合途径,并计算和比较了每个系统的结合能。配体与界面的相互作用是通过诱导契合结合机制而非锁钥机制,包括DNA在界面处展开以允许药物进入,然后DNA和配体重折叠和重新包装以进一步稳定G-四链体。基于本研究的结果,建议对TMPyp4和端粒抑素进行修饰以优化界面结合。