Suppr超能文献

新加坡慢性肝病中用于诊断显著纤维化和肝硬化的最佳肝硬度测量值。

Optimal liver stiffness measurement values for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic liver disease in Singapore.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2019 Oct;60(10):532-537. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2018156. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the widespread use of transient elastography for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis, the optimal cut-off liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values remain unclear. This study aimed to validate the optimal cut-off LSM values for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

Prospective multicentre data of CLD patients who underwent paired liver biopsy and LSM was analysed to determine the optimal cut-off LSM values for predicting significant fibrosis (METAVIR F ≥ 2) and cirrhosis (METAVIR F4). A high-quality cohort was selected by excluding those with failed LSM and invalid LSM readings.

RESULTS

Of the 481 patients recruited, 322 fulfilled the pre-defined quality criteria. CLD aetiology was chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in 49%, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 16% and chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in 12%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for LSM was 0.775 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.724-0.826) for significant fibrosis and 0.810 (95% CI 0.738-0.882) for cirrhosis. Optimal cut-off LSM values were 9 kPa for significant fibrosis and 13 kPa for cirrhosis in the general cohort. Optimal cut-off LSM values were 9 kPa for significant fibrosis and 12 kPa for cirrhosis for both CHB and CHC, while the corresponding values for NASH were 11 kPa and 15 kPa.

CONCLUSION

Optimal cut-off LSM values should be selected based on disease aetiology. In Singapore, the optimal cut-off LSM values for CHB and CHC are 9 kPa for significant fibrosis and 12 kPa for cirrhosis. Optimal cut-off values for NASH require further validation.

摘要

简介

尽管瞬时弹性成像已广泛用于非侵入性评估肝纤维化,但最佳的肝硬度测量(LSM)截断值仍不明确。本研究旨在验证慢性肝病(CLD)患者中用于预测显著纤维化(METAVIR F≥2)和肝硬化(METAVIR F4)的最佳 LSM 截断值。对接受肝活检和 LSM 检测的 CLD 患者的前瞻性多中心数据进行分析,以确定预测显著纤维化(METAVIR F≥2)和肝硬化(METAVIR F4)的最佳 LSM 截断值。通过排除 LSM 检测失败和无效的患者,选择高质量队列。

结果

在纳入的 481 例患者中,有 322 例符合预先定义的质量标准。CLD 的病因包括慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)占 49%、非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)占 16%和慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)占 12%。LSM 对显著纤维化的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.775(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.724-0.826),对肝硬化的面积为 0.810(95%CI:0.738-0.882)。在一般队列中,LSM 用于显著纤维化的最佳截断值为 9kPa,用于肝硬化的最佳截断值为 13kPa。对于 CHB 和 CHC,LSM 用于显著纤维化的最佳截断值为 9kPa,用于肝硬化的最佳截断值为 12kPa,而对于 NASH,相应的最佳截断值为 11kPa 和 15kPa。

结论

最佳的 LSM 截断值应根据疾病病因选择。在新加坡,CHB 和 CHC 的最佳 LSM 截断值用于显著纤维化的为 9kPa,用于肝硬化的为 12kPa。NASH 的最佳截断值需要进一步验证。

相似文献

2
Transient elastography for diagnosis of stages of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in people with alcoholic liver disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 22;1(1):CD010542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010542.pub2.
3
Evaluation of transient elastography in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;32(3):639-644. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13508.
5
Transient elastography for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis: a multicentre Canadian study.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;24(11):661-70. doi: 10.1155/2010/153986.
6
Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Liver Int. 2009 Feb;29(2):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01802.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
9
Non-invasive assessment of liver graft fibrosis by transient elastography after liver transplantation.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;37(4):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
10
Fibroscan can avoid liver biopsy in Indian patients with chronic hepatitis B.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;28(11):1738-45. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12318.

本文引用的文献

1
Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2012 update.
Hepatol Int. 2012 Jun;6(3):531-61. doi: 10.1007/s12072-012-9365-4. Epub 2012 May 17.
2
EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis.
J Hepatol. 2015 Jul;63(1):237-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Transient elastography improves detection of liver cirrhosis compared to routine screening tests.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 21;21(3):953-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.953.
4
Probability-based interpretation of liver stiffness measurement in untreated chronic hepatitis B patients.
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 May;60(5):1448-56. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3488-5. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
5
FibroScan (vibration-controlled transient elastography): where does it stand in the United States practice.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;13(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.039. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
6
EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2014.
J Hepatol. 2014 Aug;61(2):373-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 10.
7
8
Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;11(12):1573-84.e1-2; quiz e88-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.034. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
9
Accuracy of routine clinical ultrasound for staging of liver fibrosis.
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:58. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.101000. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
10
EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.
J Hepatol. 2012 Jul;57(1):167-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验