Suppr超能文献

控制苍蝇以预防儿童腹泻。

Fly control to prevent diarrhoea in children.

作者信息

Das Jai K, Hadi Yousaf Bashir, Salam Rehana A, Hoda Mehar, Lassi Zohra S, Bhutta Zulfiqar A

机构信息

Division of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi, Sind, Pakistan.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD011654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011654.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diarrhoeal disease accounts for millions of child deaths every year. Although the role of flies as vectors of infectious diarrhoea has been established, fly control is not often mentioned as an approach to decrease childhood diarrhoea. Theoretically, fly control for decreasing diarrhoea incidence can be achieved by intervening at four different levels: reduction or elimination of fly breeding sites; reduction of sources that attract houseflies; prevention of contact between flies and disease-causing organisms; and protection of people, food, and food utensils from contact with flies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of various housefly control measures on the incidence of diarrhoea and its related morbidity and mortality in children under five years of age.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched electronic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and LILACS, from database inception to 24 May 2018. We also searched trial registries for relevant grey literature and ongoing trials. We checked the references of the identified studies and reviews. We did not apply any filters for language, publication status (published, unpublished, in press, and ongoing), or publication date.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and controlled before-and-after studies that studied the effect of fly control on diarrhoea in children under five years of age.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted the data and independently assessed the risk of bias in the included study. We planned to contact study authors for additional information, where necessary. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one cluster-RCT (491 participants) conducted in Pakistan that evaluated insecticide spraying in the first two years and baited fly traps in the third year. Insecticide spraying reduced the fly population (house index) in the intervention group during the four months of the year when both flies and cases of diarrhoea were more common, but not at other times. On average, this was associated with a reduction in the incidence of diarrhoea in the first year (illustrative mean episodes per child-year in the intervention group was 6.3 while in the control group was 7.1) and second year of the intervention (illustrative mean episodes per child‒year in the intervention group was 4.4 while in the control group was 6.5; rate ratio (RaR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.89, low-certainty evidence). In the third year of the intervention, the baited fly traps did not demonstrate an effect on the fly population or on diarrhoea incidence (RaR 1.15, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.47, low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The trial, conducted in a setting where there were clear seasonal peaks in fly numbers and associated diarrhoea, shows insecticide spraying may reduce diarrhoea in children. Further research on whether this finding is applicable to other setting is required, as well as work on other fly control methods, their effects, feasibility, costs, and acceptability.

摘要

背景

腹泻病每年导致数百万儿童死亡。尽管苍蝇作为传染性腹泻病传播媒介的作用已得到证实,但控制苍蝇通常未被提及作为降低儿童腹泻病的一种方法。从理论上讲,可通过在四个不同层面进行干预来实现控制苍蝇以降低腹泻发病率:减少或消除苍蝇繁殖场所;减少吸引家蝇的源头;防止苍蝇与致病生物接触;以及保护人、食物和餐具不与苍蝇接触。

目的

评估各种家蝇控制措施对五岁以下儿童腹泻发病率及其相关发病率和死亡率的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了电子数据库,包括Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和LILACS,检索时间从各数据库建库至2018年5月24日。我们还检索了试验注册库以获取相关灰色文献和正在进行的试验。我们检查了已识别研究和综述的参考文献。我们未对语言、出版状态(已发表、未发表、即将发表和正在进行)或出版日期应用任何筛选条件。

选择标准

我们计划纳入随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验和前后对照研究,这些研究探讨了控制苍蝇对五岁以下儿童腹泻的影响。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者提取数据并独立评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。如有必要,我们计划联系研究作者以获取更多信息。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

我们纳入了一项在巴基斯坦进行的整群随机对照试验(491名参与者),该试验在前两年评估了杀虫剂喷洒情况,在第三年评估了诱蝇笼情况。在一年中苍蝇和腹泻病例都更为常见的四个月期间,杀虫剂喷洒使干预组的苍蝇数量(房屋指数)减少,但在其他时间未减少。平均而言,这与干预第一年腹泻发病率降低相关(干预组每个儿童年的平均发病次数示例为6.3次,而对照组为7.1次)以及干预第二年腹泻发病率降低相关(干预组每个儿童年的平均发病次数示例为4.4次,而对照组为6.5次;率比(RaR)0.77,95%置信区间(CI)0.67至0.89;低确定性证据)。在干预的第三年中,诱蝇笼对苍蝇数量或腹泻发病率均未显示出效果(RaR1.15,95%CI0.90至1.47;低确定性证据)。

作者结论

该试验在苍蝇数量和相关腹泻存在明显季节性高峰的环境中进行,表明杀虫剂喷洒可能降低儿童腹泻发病率。需要进一步研究这一发现是否适用于其他环境,以及其他苍蝇控制方法、其效果、可行性、成本和可接受性等方面的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e50/6516815/6f9df93db78c/nCD011654-AFig-FIG01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验