Snyder Robert, Galiano Robert, Mayer Perry, Rogers Lee C, Alvarez Oscar
Barry University, Miami Shores, FL, US.
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US.
J Wound Care. 2018 Dec 2;27(12):822-836. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.12.822.
To investigate the efficacy of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) as an adjunctive treatment for neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) (1A or 2A on the University of Texas grading scheme), compared with sham treatment.
We performed two multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blinded, phase III clinical trials using focused ESWT compared with sham examining DFUs that did not reduce in volume by ≥50% over 2 weeks' standard treatment immediately prior to randomisation. Patients were enrolled into the trials and randomised for either standard care and focused ESWT (pulsed acoustic cellular expression. dermaPACE System, SANUWAVE Health Inc.) active therapy, or standard care and sham therapy. Both active and sham therapy were administered four times in 2 weeks in study 1 and a maximum of eight times over 12 weeks in study 2. Standard care continued in both studies throughout the 12-week treatment phase. The proportion of DFUs that closed completely by 12, 20 and 24 weeks was measured.
The two studies evaluated 336 patients; 172 patients treated with active therapy and 164 managed with a sham device. The demographic characteristics of patients in the two arms of both studies were balanced and statistical comparison of the two studies justified pooling datasets for analysis. Statistically significantly more DFU healed at 20 (35.5% versus 24.4%; p=0.027) and 24 weeks (37.8% versus 26.2%; p=0.023) in the active treatment arm compared with the sham-controlled arm. At 12 weeks the active therapy arm trended to significance (22.7% versus 18.3%).
The outcome of these two trials suggests that ESWT is an effective therapeutic modality in combination with standard care for neuropathic DFU that do not respond to standard care alone.
探讨聚焦式体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)作为辅助治疗糖尿病神经病变足溃疡(DFU)(根据德克萨斯大学分级方案为1A或2A期)的疗效,并与假治疗进行比较。
我们进行了两项多中心、随机、假对照、双盲、III期临床试验,将聚焦式ESWT与假治疗进行比较,观察在随机分组前接受2周标准治疗后体积未减少≥50%的DFU。患者被纳入试验并随机分为标准护理加聚焦式ESWT(脉冲声学细胞表达,dermaPACE系统,SANUWAVE Health Inc.)主动治疗组,或标准护理加假治疗组。在研究1中,主动治疗和假治疗均在2周内进行4次,在研究2中,在12周内最多进行8次。在两项研究的整个12周治疗阶段,标准护理均持续进行。测量在12、20和24周时完全愈合的DFU的比例。
两项研究共评估了336例患者;172例接受主动治疗,164例使用假装置治疗。两项研究两组患者的人口统计学特征均衡,两项研究的统计学比较证明可合并数据集进行分析。与假对照组相比,主动治疗组在20周(35.5%对24.4%;p=0.027)和24周(37.8%对26.2%;p=0.023)时,统计学上有显著更多的DFU愈合。在12周时,主动治疗组有趋于显著的趋势(22.7%对18.3%)。
这两项试验的结果表明,对于单独标准护理无反应的糖尿病神经病变DFU,ESWT与标准护理联合使用是一种有效的治疗方式。