• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Wallstent 治疗慢性髂股静脉阻塞的长期临床结果和技术因素。

Long-term clinical outcomes and technical factors with the Wallstent for treatment of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

机构信息

The Vascular Experts, Darien, Conn.

Vascular Breakthroughs, LLC, Darien, Conn.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jan;7(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.07.016
PMID:30558730
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Factors affecting long-term clinical outcome and stent patency after iliofemoral venous stenting remain complex and ill-defined. Also, consensus is lacking among clinicians regarding the continuing role for the Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass) as dedicated nitinol-based venous stents become available. We undertook this study to review our long-term results using Wallstents and to evaluate the potential role of this stent in the future.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2014, there were 77 limbs in 67 consecutive patients that received Wallstents for chronic iliofemoral vein obstruction. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and venography were used to assess lesion type and extent. Baseline clinical severity was assessed with Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification. Clinical improvement was assessed with VCSS at 12, 24, and 36 months. VCSS change ≥4 points was considered significant improvement. Patency was assessed with duplex ultrasound. A retrospective review of patients' records and imaging was conducted to assess baseline and procedural factors associated with long-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Lesions were nonthrombotic in 42 limbs (55%) and left-sided in 48 limbs (62%). Ten patients were treated for bilateral venous disease. Patients were predominantly male (55%); median age was 63 years (range, 47-83 years). Median baseline VCSS was 9 (range, 3-23). IVUS and venography estimated equal vessel compromise length in 37 limbs (48%). IVUS estimated a longer lesion in 32 limbs (42%). Stenting correlated with venography and IVUS in 37 limbs (48%) and more closely aligned with IVUS in 35 limbs (45%). Stents extended into the common femoral vein (CFV) in 17 limbs (22%) and into the inferior vena cava in 6 limbs (8%). Sixty-five (97%) patients had available imaging follow-up (median, 50 months). At 72 months, primary patency in the overall cohort was 87%; assisted primary patency and secondary patency were both 95%. In the nonthrombotic subset, assisted primary patency and secondary patency were 100%; primary patency was 97%. In the post-thrombotic subset, primary patency was 75%; assisted primary patency and secondary patency were 88%. Three early failures occurred. Eight patients required reintervention (range, 0.5-80 months); five interventions were to maintain patency. Cox multivariate regression identified that CFV disease predicted later complications. At last VCSS follow-up per patient (median, 26 months), 52 patients (68%) showed ≥4-point VCSS improvement. None had score worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Venous stenting with Wallstents for iliofemoral post-thrombotic or compressive obstruction proved safe and effective through long-term follow-up, with excellent patency rates. The majority of patients exhibited significant clinical improvement. CFV occlusive disease predicts increased complications.

摘要

背景

影响髂股静脉支架置入术后长期临床结局和支架通畅率的因素仍然复杂且不明确。此外,临床医生对于 Wallstent(波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)的持续作用存在分歧,因为专用的镍钛诺静脉支架已经问世。我们进行这项研究是为了回顾我们使用 Wallstent 的长期结果,并评估该支架在未来的潜在作用。

方法

2007 年至 2014 年,连续 67 例患者的 77 条肢体因慢性髂股静脉阻塞接受 Wallstent 治疗。血管内超声(IVUS)和静脉造影用于评估病变类型和程度。基线临床严重程度采用静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)和临床、病因、解剖和病理生理学(CEAP)分类进行评估。采用 VCSS 在 12、24 和 36 个月时评估临床改善情况。VCSS 改善≥4 分被认为是显著改善。通过双功超声评估通畅率。对患者的病历和影像学资料进行回顾性分析,以评估与长期临床结局相关的基线和手术因素。

结果

病变在 42 条肢体(55%)中为非血栓性,在 48 条肢体(62%)中为左侧。10 例患者因双侧静脉疾病接受治疗。患者主要为男性(55%);中位年龄为 63 岁(范围 47-83 岁)。中位基线 VCSS 为 9 分(范围 3-23 分)。IVUS 和静脉造影在 37 条肢体(48%)中估计等长的血管阻塞,在 32 条肢体(42%)中 IVUS 估计更长的病变。支架与静脉造影和 IVUS 相符在 37 条肢体(48%)中,与 IVUS 更相符在 35 条肢体(45%)中。支架延伸至股总静脉(CFV)的有 17 条肢体(22%),延伸至下腔静脉的有 6 条肢体(8%)。65 例(97%)患者有可用的影像学随访(中位随访时间为 50 个月)。72 个月时,总体队列的初始通畅率为 87%;辅助初始通畅率和二级通畅率均为 95%。在非血栓性亚组中,辅助初始通畅率和二级通畅率均为 100%;初始通畅率为 97%。在血栓后亚组中,初始通畅率为 75%;辅助初始通畅率和二级通畅率为 88%。有 3 例早期失败。8 例患者需要再次干预(范围 0.5-80 个月);5 次干预是为了维持通畅率。Cox 多变量回归分析发现 CFV 疾病预测后期并发症。在最后一次每位患者的 VCSS 随访(中位随访时间 26 个月)中,52 例患者(68%)的 VCSS 改善≥4 分。无一例患者的评分恶化。

结论

髂股静脉支架置入术治疗血栓后或压迫性阻塞安全有效,通过长期随访,通畅率高,效果良好。大多数患者都表现出明显的临床改善。CFV 闭塞性疾病预测并发症增加。

相似文献

1
Long-term clinical outcomes and technical factors with the Wallstent for treatment of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.Wallstent 治疗慢性髂股静脉阻塞的长期临床结果和技术因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jan;7(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
Long-term outcomes following use of a composite Wallstent-Z stent approach to iliofemoral venous stenting.使用复合 Wallstent-Z 支架方法进行髂股静脉支架置入术的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Mar;9(2):393-400.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Analysis of threshold stenosis by multiplanar venogram and intravascular ultrasound examination for predicting clinical improvement after iliofemoral vein stenting in the VIDIO trial.分析多平面静脉造影和血管内超声检查的狭窄阈值,以预测 VIDIO 试验中髂股静脉支架置入后临床改善的情况。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jan;6(1):48-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
4
Placement of closed-cell designed venous stents in a mixed cohort of patients with chronic venous outflow obstructions - short-term safety, patency, and clinical outcomes.在慢性静脉流出道梗阻患者的混合队列中置入闭孔设计的静脉支架——短期安全性、通畅性及临床结局
Vasa. 2018 Oct;47(6):475-481. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000731. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Effect of body mass index on initial presentation and outcomes after stenting for quality of life-impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.体质指数对生活质量受损的慢性髂股静脉阻塞支架置入术后初次表现和结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Mar;10(2):325-333.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Impact of native iliac vein aspect ratio on initial clinical presentation and outcomes following stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.髂内静脉形态比与症状性慢性髂股静脉阻塞支架置入术后初始临床表现和结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Sep;12(5):101900. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101900. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
7
Contralateral limb improvement after unilateral iliac vein stenting argues against simultaneous bilateral stenting.单侧髂静脉支架置入术后对侧肢体改善提示不支持同期双侧支架置入。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jul;8(4):565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Utility of the 50% stenosis criterion for patients undergoing stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.慢性髂股静脉阻塞患者支架置入术中 50%狭窄标准的应用。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Nov;9(6):1408-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
9
Anticoagulation reduces iliocaval and iliofemoral stent thrombosis in patients with cancer stented for nonthrombotic venous obstruction.抗凝治疗可降低因非血栓性静脉阻塞而置入支架的癌症患者的髂股静脉和髂总静脉支架血栓形成风险。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jan;9(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
Technique of stent sizing in patients with symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction-the case for intravascular ultrasound-determined inflow channel luminal area-based stenting and associated long-term outcomes.有症状的慢性髂股静脉阻塞患者的支架尺寸确定技术——基于血管内超声测定流入道管腔面积的支架置入情况及相关长期预后
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023 May;11(3):634-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.12.067. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion From SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS.血管内超声在周围动脉和深静脉介入治疗中的应用:来自SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS的多学科专家意见
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Jan 9;3(1):101205. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101205. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Interventional treatment for post-thrombotic chronic venous obstruction: Progress and challenges.介入治疗血栓后慢性静脉阻塞:进展与挑战。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Sep;12(5):101910. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101910. Epub 2024 May 20.
3
Indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of stent placement in chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.
髂股静脉慢性阻塞性病变支架置入的适应证、技术要点及疗效。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Sep;12(5):101904. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101904. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
A comprehensive study on venous endovascular management and stenting in deep veins occlusion and stenosis: A review study.深静脉闭塞和狭窄的静脉血管腔内治疗与支架置入综合研究:一项综述研究
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Apr 16;19:131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.001. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Iliocaval and iliofemoral venous stenting for obstruction secondary to tumor compression.髂总静脉和髂股静脉支架置入术治疗肿瘤压迫继发的梗阻
CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Mar 22;7(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00438-6.
6
Iliocaval and Iliofemoral Venous Stenting for Obstruction Secondary to Tumor Compression: Single Center Experience.髂腔静脉和髂股静脉支架置入术治疗肿瘤压迫继发的梗阻:单中心经验
Res Sq. 2023 Nov 28:rs.3.rs-3588250. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3588250/v1.
7
Case Report: It's not always about the veins; intervention of bilateral May-Thurner Syndrome secondary to iliac aneurysm.病例报告:并非总是关乎静脉;髂动脉瘤继发双侧梅-图二氏综合征的干预治疗
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 16;10:1279981. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1279981. eCollection 2023.
8
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents.髂股动脉阻塞介入治疗后 12 个月通畅率的系统评价和荟萃分析:专用或非专用静脉支架的应用
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;29(3):478-492. doi: 10.1177/15266028211057085. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Female Gender is a Predictor of Lower Iliac Vein Stenting Patency Rates.女性性别是髂静脉支架通畅率较低的预测因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;78:247-256. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.027. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
10
[Antithrombotic therapy after iliac vein stenting].髂静脉支架置入术后的抗栓治疗
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 May 25;49(1):131-136. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.02.15.