Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Endod. 2019 Jan;45(1):68-72.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.10.002.
This study was performed to evaluate how the speed of up-and-down motion affects the canal centering ability and torque/force generation of ProTaper Next rotary instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
Twenty-one simulated resin canal blocks with a J-shaped canal were prepared with ProTaper Next X1, X2, and X3 instruments using an original automated root canal instrumentation and torque/force analyzing device with up-and-down speed settings of 10, 50, and 100 mm/min (low-, medium-, and high-speed groups, respectively). Pre- and postinstrumentation images were superimposed, and centering ratios were calculated at 0-3 mm from the apex. The maximum vertical force and torque were also recorded. The results were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test.
At 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mm from the apex, the high-speed group showed the lowest centering ratio (ie, least deviation) followed by the medium-speed and low-speed groups (P < .05). Force values (downward and upward) tended to increase as the up-and-down speed increased; with the X2 and X3 instruments, the high-speed and/or medium-speed groups generated significantly larger values than the low-speed group (P < .05). With all instruments, the high-speed and/or medium-speed groups generated significantly larger clockwise torque than the low-speed group (P < .05). One and 2 X2 instruments fractured in the low- and high-speed groups, respectively.
The up-and-down speed affected the canal centering ability and stress generation of ProTaper Next instruments. The high-speed group showed the best centering ability but tended to generate larger vertical force and torque than the medium- and low-speed groups.
本研究旨在评估上下运动速度如何影响 Protaper Next 机用镍钛锉的根管预备时的根管中心定位能力和扭矩/力的产生。
使用 ProTaper Next X1、X2 和 X3 锉,在具有 J 形根管的 21 个模拟树脂根管模型上,使用原始的自动化根管预备和扭矩/力分析设备,以 10、50 和 100mm/min(低速、中速和高速组,分别)的上下速度进行预备。在预备前后对图像进行叠加,并计算距根尖 0-3mm 的中心定位比。还记录了最大垂直力和扭矩。使用单向方差分析和 Tukey 检验对结果进行统计学分析。
在距根尖 0、0.5、1 和 2mm 处,高速组的中心定位比(即偏差最小)最低,其次是中速和低速组(P<.05)。力值(向下和向上)随着上下速度的增加而增加;使用 X2 和 X3 锉时,高速和/或中速组产生的数值明显大于低速组(P<.05)。使用所有器械,高速和/或中速组产生的顺时针扭矩明显大于低速组(P<.05)。1 个和 2 个 X2 锉分别在低速组和高速组中折断。
上下速度影响 Protaper Next 锉的根管中心定位能力和应力产生。高速组的中心定位能力最好,但产生的垂直力和扭矩大于中速和低速组。