Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2467-2476. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.033.
The authors sought to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes following contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) trial.
Patients with DM are at increased risk for adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate in a noninferiority design the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents among 1,919 patients undergoing PCI. Randomization was stratified to the presence of medically treated DM, and a pre-specified analysis compared outcomes according to the presence or absence of DM up to 2 years.
The overall prevalence of DM was 29.1% (559 of 1,919). DM patients had higher body mass index, greater prevalence of hyperlipidemia and hypertension, and smaller reference vessel diameter. One-year target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was significantly higher among diabetic patients (7.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.002), mainly due to higher target lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.002). Rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis did not statistically vary. Among 158 patients undergoing 13-month angiographic follow-up, restenosis rates were 3 times higher in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic patients (15.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.01). Clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar between ridaforolimus-eluting stent- and zotarolimus-eluting stent-treated patients.
Despite advances in interventional therapies, and the implementation of new-generation DES, diabetic patients still have worse angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients undergoing PCI.
作者旨在研究在 BIONICS(生物 NIR 瑞马唑仑洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗冠状动脉狭窄)试验中,糖尿病(DM)对当代药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后结局的影响。
患有 DM 的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后发生不良事件的风险增加。
进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、1:1 随机试验,以非劣效性设计评估瑞马唑仑洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架在 1919 例接受 PCI 的患者中的安全性和疗效。随机分组分层至存在经药物治疗的 DM,并且根据存在或不存在 DM 进行了预先指定的分析,直至 2 年。
DM 的总体患病率为 29.1%(1919 例中的 559 例)。DM 患者的体重指数更高,高脂血症和高血压的患病率更高,参考血管直径更小。1 年时的靶病变失败(心脏死亡、靶病变心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建)在糖尿病患者中明显更高(7.8% vs. 4.2%;p=0.002),主要是由于靶病变血运重建更高(4.5% vs. 2.0%;p=0.002)。心脏死亡、心肌梗死和支架血栓形成的发生率无统计学差异。在 158 例接受 13 个月血管造影随访的患者中,糖尿病患者的再狭窄率是无糖尿病患者的 3 倍(15.2% vs. 4.7%;p=0.01)。瑞马唑仑洗脱支架和佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者之间临床和血管造影结局相似。
尽管介入治疗技术取得了进展,并且实施了新一代 DES,但与接受 PCI 的非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的血管造影和临床结局仍然较差。