Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Nantes, France.
Institut Universitaire du Cancer, CHU, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, INSERM, 1037, Toulouse, France.
Leukemia. 2019 Feb;33(2):313-318. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0339-y. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
The most recent update to the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria places a strong emphasis on the need for more sensitive haematological markers of response driven by the success of novel therapies. One such marker is serum free light chain (sFLC) analysis, which was first incorporated into the definition of stringent complete response in 2006. However, over the past decade there has been some reluctance to extend the role of the sFLC assays to replace 24 h urine electrophoresis for monitoring multiple myeloma (MM). In this review, we lay out the evidence in favour of serum over urine for monoclonal FLC measurements and propose modified criteria for response assignment in myeloma.
国际骨髓瘤工作组共识标准的最新更新非常强调需要更敏感的血液学反应标志物,这是新型疗法成功的驱动因素。其中一个标志物是血清游离轻链(sFLC)分析,它于 2006 年首次被纳入严格完全缓解的定义中。然而,在过去十年中,人们一直不愿意扩大 sFLC 检测的作用,以取代 24 小时尿液电泳来监测多发性骨髓瘤(MM)。在这篇综述中,我们列出了支持用血清而非尿液进行单克隆 FLC 测量的证据,并提出了骨髓瘤反应赋值的修正标准。