Centre for Restorative Dentistry, Defence Primary Health Care (Dental), Evelyn Woods Road, Aldershot, GU11 2LS.
Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Gosport, PO12 2DL.
Br Dent J. 2018 Dec 21;225(12):1068-1072. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.1037.
To assess factors influencing access to dental care and to determine the true level of dental morbidity experienced by UK military personnel serving on Operation Herrick.
Data on dental emergencies were collected prospectively over an 18-month period. Deployed personnel were divided into those co-located with a dental centre and those not co-located. Personnel were separately surveyed on return from Operation Herrick; individuals who had suffered an oral/dental problem whilst deployed were asked to complete a questionnaire.
There were 4,017 dental emergency attendances by 3,355 UK military personnel (282/1,000 man years at risk). A total of 278 non-co-located patients were transported with the sole purpose of seeing a dental officer, 79% by helicopter; a median of 24 hours was lost from their operational role (vs one hour for those co-located). In the cohort surveyed after their return from Afghanistan, 37/118 (31.4%) patients who had wanted to see a dentist whilst deployed did not manage to.
Dental morbidity is common and can affect operational effectiveness, but this risk is reduced by co-location with a dental centre. There is a substantial component of 'hidden' dental morbidity in deployed personnel. Evaluating dental morbidity using dental centre attendees likely underestimates the true levels by approximately a third.
评估影响牙科保健可及性的因素,并确定在英国军事人员在“赫尔里克行动”中所经历的真实牙科发病率水平。
在 18 个月的时间内,前瞻性地收集了牙科急诊数据。将部署人员分为与牙科中心同地部署和不同地部署两类。人员在从“赫尔里克行动”返回后分别进行了调查;在部署期间遭受口腔/牙齿问题的个人被要求填写问卷。
3355 名英国军事人员中有 4017 人因牙科急诊就诊(282/1000 人年的风险)。共有 278 名非同地部署的患者被专门运送以看牙医,其中 79%是乘坐直升机;与同地部署的人员相比,他们的作战角色损失中位数为 24 小时(vs 1 小时)。在从阿富汗返回后接受调查的队列中,37/118(31.4%)名在部署期间想要看牙医的患者未能如愿。
牙科发病率很高,可能会影响作战效果,但与牙科中心同地部署可降低这种风险。部署人员中存在大量“隐性”牙科发病率。使用牙科中心就诊者评估牙科发病率可能会低估真实水平约三分之一。