Rangan Vikram, Zakari Mohammed, Hirsch William, Ballou Sarah, Singh Prashant, Sommers Thomas, Iturrino Johanna, Nee Judy, Staller Kyle, Lembo Anthony
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1578-1585. doi: 10.1177/2050640618798227. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
A subset of patients with functional defecation disorders have predominance of the puborectalis muscle (PRM) on three-dimensional high definition anorectal manometry (HDARM), known as paradoxical puborectalis syndrome (PPS). The aim of this study was to assess clinical and manometric differences between patients with and without PPS.
A total of 227 women with functional defecation disorders undergoing HDARM between December 2012 and October 2016 at a single center were included in this study. All completed the Rome III constipation module and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20).
Eighty-seven out of 227 women had a 3D pressure topographic profile consistent with PPS. They had higher mean PDFI-20 scores for straining and incomplete evacuation symptoms than those without PPS. In addition, they demonstrated higher mean resting anal pressure, a more negative mean anorectal pressure differential, and a greater proportion with prolonged balloon expulsion test. These findings were more pronounced in a subgroup of 58 PPS patients with a distinct pattern of both posterior and posterolateral wall indentation.
Among female patients with functional defecation disorders, those with PPS demonstrated clinical and manometric differences compared to those without PPS. These differences may be driven by predominant posterolateral wall indentation in a subgroup of PPS patients.
在功能性排便障碍患者中,有一部分患者在三维高清肛门直肠测压(HDARM)检查时耻骨直肠肌(PRM)占优势,这被称为矛盾性耻骨直肠肌综合征(PPS)。本研究的目的是评估有和没有PPS的患者之间的临床和测压差异。
本研究纳入了2012年12月至2016年10月期间在单一中心接受HDARM检查的227名功能性排便障碍女性患者。所有患者均完成了罗马III型便秘模块和盆底困扰量表20(PFDI-20)。
227名女性中有87名患者的三维压力地形图符合PPS。与没有PPS的患者相比,她们在用力排便和排便不尽症状方面的PFDI-20平均得分更高。此外,她们的平均静息肛门压力更高,平均肛门直肠压力差更负,并且在球囊排出试验延长的患者比例更高。这些发现在58名具有后壁和后外侧壁明显压痕模式的PPS患者亚组中更为明显。
在功能性排便障碍的女性患者中,与没有PPS的患者相比,有PPS的患者表现出临床和测压差异。这些差异可能是由PPS患者亚组中主要的后外侧壁压痕所驱动的。