Miranda-Mendizábal Andrea, Vargas Ingrid, Mogollón-Pérez Amparo-Susana, Eguiguren Pamela, Ferreira de Medeiros Mendes Marina, López Julieta, Bertolotto Fernando, Amarilla Delia, Vázquez Navarrete María-Luisa
Servei d'Estudis i Prospectives en Polítiques de Salut, Grup de Recerca en Polítiques de Salut i Serveis Sanitaris (GRPSS), Consorci de Salut i Social de Catalunya, Barcelona, España.
Servei d'Estudis i Prospectives en Polítiques de Salut, Grup de Recerca en Polítiques de Salut i Serveis Sanitaris (GRPSS), Consorci de Salut i Social de Catalunya, Barcelona, España.
Gac Sanit. 2020 Jul-Aug;34(4):340-349. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries.
Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted.
Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors.
The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors.
分析六个拉丁美洲国家公共医疗网络中护理协调机制的知识水平、使用情况及使用特征。
采用横断面研究,于2015年5月至10月对阿根廷、巴西、智利、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和乌拉圭公共医疗网络中的初级和二级护理医生(每个国家348名医生)使用COORDENA®问卷进行调查。分析变量包括:信息协调(转诊/回复信、出院报告、电话、电子邮件)和临床管理协调(共享临床指南、联合会议)机制的知识程度和使用情况。进行描述性分析。
在两个护理级别和所分析的网络中,临床信息协调机制的知识水平以及转诊/回复信的使用情况都很高。出院报告的使用差异更大(从巴西的40.0%到墨西哥的79.4%),除阿根廷外,初级护理医生报告的接收率较低(哥伦比亚为12.3%,乌拉圭为55.1%)。相比之下,临床管理协调机制的知识有限,尤其是在二级护理医生中。然而,值得注意的是,对临床指南的遵守程度很高(从墨西哥的83.1%到巴西的96.8%),而参加联合会议的情况差异很大(从智利的23.7%到巴西的76.2%)。报告的机制使用困难与结构和组织因素有关。
协调机制的知识和使用有限,表明其传播和实施不足。需要采取增加其使用的策略,包括相关因素。