School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, London, United Kingdom.
St John's Institute of Dermatology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jun;143(6):2120-2130. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.038. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
Biologic therapies can be highly effective for the treatment of severe psoriasis, but response for individual patients can vary according to drug. Predictive biomarkers to guide treatment selection could improve patient outcomes and treatment cost-effectiveness.
We sought to test whether HLA-C*06:02, the primary genetic susceptibility allele for psoriasis, predisposes patients to respond differently to the 2 most commonly prescribed biologics for psoriasis: adalimumab (anti-TNF-α) and ustekinumab (anti-IL-12/23).
This study uses a national psoriasis registry that includes longitudinal treatment and response observations and detailed clinical data. HLA alleles were imputed from genome-wide genotype data for 1326 patients for whom 90% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI90) response status was observed after 3, 6, or 12 months of treatment. We developed regression models of PASI90 response, examining the interaction between HLA-C*06:02 and drug type (adalimumab or ustekinumab) while accounting for potentially confounding clinical variables.
HLA-C06:02-negative patients were significantly more likely to respond to adalimumab than ustekinumab at all time points (most strongly at 6 months: odds ratio [OR], 2.95; P = 5.85 × 10), and the difference was greater in HLA-C06:02-negative patients with psoriatic arthritis (OR, 5.98; P = 6.89 × 10). Biologic-naive patients who were HLA-C06:02 positive and psoriatic arthritis negative demonstrated significantly poorer response to adalimumab at 12 months (OR, 0.31; P = 3.42 × 10). Results from HLA-wide analyses were consistent with HLA-C06:02 itself being the primary effect allele. We found no evidence for genetic interaction between HLA-C*06:02 and ERAP1.
This large observational study suggests that reference to HLA-C*06:02 status could offer substantial clinical benefit when selecting treatments for severe psoriasis.
生物疗法在治疗严重银屑病方面可能非常有效,但个体患者的反应可能因药物而异。预测生物标志物来指导治疗选择可以改善患者的预后和治疗成本效益。
我们旨在测试 HLA-C*06:02(银屑病的主要遗传易感等位基因)是否使患者对两种最常开处方的银屑病生物制剂(阿达木单抗(抗 TNF-α)和乌司奴单抗(抗 IL-12/23))的反应不同。
本研究使用了一个全国性的银屑病登记处,该登记处包括纵向治疗和反应观察以及详细的临床数据。对 1326 名患者的全基因组基因型数据进行 HLA 等位基因推断,这些患者在接受治疗 3、6 或 12 个月后,90%的银屑病面积和严重程度指数评分(PASI90)反应得到缓解。我们开发了 PASI90 反应的回归模型,在考虑潜在混杂临床变量的同时,检查 HLA-C*06:02 与药物类型(阿达木单抗或乌司奴单抗)之间的相互作用。
在所有时间点,HLA-C06:02 阴性患者对阿达木单抗的反应明显优于乌司奴单抗(在 6 个月时最强:比值比[OR],2.95;P=5.85×10),在 HLA-C06:02 阴性且患有银屑病关节炎的患者中差异更大(OR,5.98;P=6.89×10)。HLA-C06:02 阳性且无银屑病关节炎的生物制剂初治患者在 12 个月时对阿达木单抗的反应明显较差(OR,0.31;P=3.42×10)。HLA 全基因组分析的结果与 HLA-C06:02 本身作为主要效应等位基因一致。我们没有发现 HLA-C*06:02 与 ERAP1 之间存在遗传相互作用的证据。
这项大型观察性研究表明,在为严重银屑病选择治疗方法时,参考 HLA-C*06:02 状态可能会带来显著的临床获益。