Suppr超能文献

打破40年的沉默:头颈部软组织肉瘤新分期系统的理论依据。

Ending 40 years of silence: Rationale for a new staging system for soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck.

作者信息

Hahn Ezra, Huang Shao Hui, Hosni Ali, Razak Albiruni Abdul, Jones Robin L, Dickson Brendan C, Sturgis Erich M, Patel Snehal G, O'Sullivan Brian

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network/University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network/University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 27;15:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.11.009. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Abstract

The tumor, node, metastases (TNM) anatomic staging system plays a pivotal role in cancer care, research, and cancer control activities. Since the first edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging classification published in 1977, soft tissue sarcomas have been staged in an anatomic site agnostic fashion whereby the primary tumor size (T) was categorized as T1 if <=5 cm and T2 if >5 cm; this remained unchanged through the 7th edition of the TNM. However, soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck (STSHN) usually present smaller than sarcomas of other sites, but carry a disproportionate risk of local recurrence. Up to 70% of tumors are less than 5 cm at presentation, and therefore classified together as T1. Given the rarity of STSHN, there is a paucity of data to guide progress in their classification. Moreover, the majority of publications only report tumor size as less than or greater than 5 cm, presumably based on conventions of the TNM system that remained unchanged for 40 years, thereby affecting progress of STSHN classification. This formed the impetus for change in the 8th edition in 2 key ways: 1) several soft tissue sarcoma site based changes occurred including STSHN now having its own system, and 2) primary tumor size cut-offs of 2 cm and 4 cm used in STSHN now reflect sizes that head and neck specialists commonly encounter in their practice. This update was pragmatic in modifying the TNM from a system with a T category not serving STSHN and which was originally based on sarcoma data from non-head and neck anatomic sites. The background to this change is outlined which provides a framework in which data can be reported to generate evidence for future staging modifications.

摘要

肿瘤、淋巴结、转移灶(TNM)解剖学分期系统在癌症治疗、研究及癌症控制活动中发挥着关键作用。自1977年美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)发布第一版TNM分期分类以来,软组织肉瘤一直采用与解剖部位无关的分期方式,即原发肿瘤大小(T)若≤5 cm则分类为T1,若>5 cm则分类为T2;在TNM第7版之前此标准一直未变。然而,头颈部软组织肉瘤(STSHN)通常比其他部位的肉瘤体积小,但局部复发风险却不成比例地高。高达70%的肿瘤在初诊时小于5 cm,因此都被归类为T1。鉴于STSHN较为罕见,缺乏指导其分类进展的数据。此外,大多数出版物仅报告肿瘤大小小于或大于5 cm,这大概是基于40年来一直未变的TNM系统惯例,从而影响了STSHN分类的进展。这成为了第8版在两个关键方面进行改变的动力:1)基于软组织肉瘤部位的多项改变发生了,包括STSHN现在有了自己的系统;2)STSHN中使用的2 cm和4 cm的原发肿瘤大小临界值现在反映了头颈专科医生在实践中常见的大小。此次更新很务实,它将TNM从一个T分类不适用于STSHN且最初基于非头颈部解剖部位肉瘤数据的系统进行了修改。本文概述了这一变化的背景,提供了一个框架,在此框架中可以报告数据以生成未来分期修改的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dca3/6293017/d6a5454f0570/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Ending 40 years of silence: Rationale for a new staging system for soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 27;15:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.11.009. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Soft tissue sarcoma of the head & neck: nomogram validation and analysis of staging systems.
J Surg Oncol. 2015 May;111(6):690-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23868. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
Overview of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):40. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0484-y.
6
Evaluation of head and neck soft tissue sarcoma 8th edition pathologic staging system and proposal of a novel stage grouping system.
Oral Oncol. 2021 Mar;114:105137. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105137. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Pretreatment tumor sampling and prognostic factors in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;279(6):3147-3155. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07162-0. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The TNM classification of malignant tumours-towards common understanding and reasonable expectations.
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):849-851. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30438-2.
2
Clinical effect of molecular methods in sarcoma diagnosis (GENSARC): a prospective, multicentre, observational study.
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):532-538. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00583-5. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
4
Soft tissue sarcoma of the head & neck: nomogram validation and analysis of staging systems.
J Surg Oncol. 2015 May;111(6):690-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23868. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
Analysis of clinical prognostic factors for adult patients with head and neck sarcomas.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;151(6):976-83. doi: 10.1177/0194599814551539. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
6
Prognostic factors and oncological outcomes of 122 head and neck soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at a single institution.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;22(1):248-55. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3870-8. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: unique lack of significance of synchronous node metastases.
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;106(7):837-43. doi: 10.1002/jso.23148. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Carbon ion radiation therapy improves the prognosis of unresectable adult bone and soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):2125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.043.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验