Suppr超能文献

一项基于人群的队列研究,旨在探讨腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后腹部癌症的风险。

A population-based cohort study examining the risk of abdominal cancer after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom; Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1776-1785.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.058. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has increasingly been used as the primary treatment approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study examined the hypothesis that EVAR leads to an increased risk of abdominal cancer within the radiation field compared with open AAA repair.

METHODS

The nationwide English Hospital Episode Statistics database was used to identify all patients older than 50 years who received an AAA repair in 2005 to 2013. EVAR and open AAA repair groups were compared for the incidence of postoperative cancer using inverse probability weights and G-computation formula to adjust for selection bias and confounding.

RESULTS

Among 14,150 patients who underwent EVAR and 24,645 patients who underwent open AAA repair, follow-up was up to 7 years. EVAR was associated with an increased risk of postoperative abdominal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.27) and all cancers (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17). However, there was no difference between the groups in the risk of lung cancer (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.18) or obesity-related nonabdominal cancer (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.69-1.83). Within the EVAR group, use of computed tomography surveillance was not associated with any increased risk of abdominal cancer (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71-1.23) or all cancers (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81-1.17).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests an increased risk of abdominal cancer after EVAR compared with open AAA repair. The differential cancer risk should be further explored in alternative national populations, and radiation exposure during EVAR should be measured as a quality metric in the assessment of EVAR centers.

摘要

目的

血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)已越来越多地被用作治疗腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的主要方法。本研究检验了这样一种假设,即与开放 AAA 修复相比,EVAR 会增加辐射场内腹部癌症的风险。

方法

使用全国性的英文医院病例统计数据库,确定 2005 年至 2013 年间所有 50 岁以上接受 AAA 修复的患者。使用逆概率权重和 G 计算公式比较 EVAR 和开放 AAA 修复组的术后癌症发生率,以调整选择偏差和混杂因素。

结果

在 14150 名接受 EVAR 治疗的患者和 24645 名接受开放 AAA 修复的患者中,随访时间最长可达 7 年。EVAR 与术后腹部癌症(风险比 [HR],1.14;95%置信区间 [CI],1.03-1.27)和所有癌症(HR,1.09;95% CI,1.02-1.17)的风险增加相关。然而,两组间肺癌(HR,1.04;95% CI,0.92-1.18)或肥胖相关非腹部癌症(HR,1.12;95% CI,0.69-1.83)的风险无差异。在 EVAR 组中,使用计算机断层扫描监测与腹部癌症(HR,0.94;95% CI,0.71-1.23)或所有癌症(HR,0.97;95% CI,0.81-1.17)的风险增加无关。

结论

本研究表明,与开放 AAA 修复相比,EVAR 后腹部癌症的风险增加。应在其他国家人群中进一步探讨这种差异的癌症风险,并且应将 EVAR 期间的辐射暴露作为评估 EVAR 中心的质量指标进行测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验