School of Social Work, McGill University, Canada.
School of Nursing, McMaster University, Canada.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Mar;20(3):262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
This article reports findings on the usability and staff use of 5 condition- specific pamphlets of high prevalence in long-term care (LTC): dementia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, and frailty. The pamphlets were created in response to residents', families', and staff's recommendations for activating early reflections and communication about end-of-life care.
A mixed-method (qualitative and quantitative) survey design was used. Step 1 collected survey data on the usability of the pamphlets. Step 2 collected survey data on pamphlet use.
Two nurses with specialized palliative care training, 2 resident/family representatives, 10 condition-specific specialists, and 33 LTC palliative leads reviewed the pamphlets for usability prior to distribution. A total of 178 LTC home staff in 4 participating LTC homes reported on pamphlet use.
Specialists and resident/family representatives were asked to provide open comments and LTC home palliative leads were asked to complete a survey on the accuracy, readability, and relevance of the pamphlets. After 6 months of distribution, all staff in participating LTC homes were asked to complete a survey on pamphlet use, usefulness, and comfort with distribution.
The pamphlets were reportedly accurate, relevant, and easy to understand. Following 6 months of availability, most staff in LTC had read the pamphlets, found the information useful, and planned to share them. However, half of the staff questioned their role in pamphlet distribution and most had not distributed them. Regulated staff (ie, staff affiliated with a regulated profession) expressed more comfort sharing the pamphlets than care aides and support staff.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Condition-specific pamphlets appear to hold promise in providing residents and families with relevant information that may activate early reflections and conversations about end-of-life care. However, structured implementation strategies, training, and discussions are required to improve staff comfort with distribution and explore roles in distribution and follow-up.
本文报告了在长期护理(LTC)中高患病率的 5 种特定病症的小册子的可用性和工作人员使用情况:痴呆、心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肾衰竭和虚弱。这些小册子是根据居民、家属和工作人员的建议制作的,旨在促进对终末期护理的早期反思和沟通。
采用混合方法(定性和定量)调查设计。第 1 步收集小册子可用性的调查数据。第 2 步收集小册子使用情况的调查数据。
2 名具有专业姑息治疗培训的护士、2 名居民/家属代表、10 名特定病症专家和 33 名 LTC 姑息治疗负责人在分发前对小册子的可用性进行了审查。4 家参与的 LTC 机构的 178 名 LTC 家庭工作人员报告了小册子的使用情况。
专家和居民/家属代表被要求提供开放性意见,LTC 家庭姑息治疗负责人被要求完成一份关于小册子准确性、可读性和相关性的调查。在分发 6 个月后,所有参与 LTC 家庭的工作人员都被要求完成一份关于小册子使用情况、有用性以及分发小册子的舒适度的调查。
小册子被报告为准确、相关且易于理解。在分发 6 个月后,LTC 中的大多数工作人员都阅读了小册子,认为信息有用,并计划分享。然而,一半的工作人员对他们在小册子分发中的角色表示质疑,而且大多数人没有分发小册子。受监管的工作人员(即隶属于受监管职业的工作人员)比护理助理和支持人员更愿意分享小册子。
结论/含义:特定病症的小册子似乎有希望为居民和家属提供相关信息,从而促进对终末期护理的早期反思和对话。然而,需要制定结构化的实施策略、培训和讨论,以提高工作人员分发小册子的舒适度,并探索在分发和随访中的角色。