Suppr超能文献

Meta 分析比较试验评估一种一次性使用闭合切口负压治疗系统。

Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Single-Use Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy System.

机构信息

From the Anne Arundel Medical Center; Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Stanford University School of Medicine; and Wake Forest School of Medicine.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1S Management of Surgical Incisions Utilizing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy):41S-46S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005312.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose a significant surgical complication. Application of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been associated with reduced SSI rates in published literature. This meta-analysis examines the effect of ciNPT use over closed incisions in reducing SSIs versus traditional dressings.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, OVID, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and QUOSA was performed focusing on publications between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2018. Characteristics of study participants, surgical procedure, type of dressing used, duration of treatment, incidence of SSI, and length of follow-up were extracted. Weighted odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated to pool study and control groups in each publication for analysis. Treatment effects were combined using Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios as the summary statistics, and a fixed-effects model was used for each analysis performed. The chi-square test was used to statistically assess heterogeneity. For each meta-analysis performed, the more conservative random-effects models were conducted as sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

For all meta-analyses (randomized controlled trial only, observational studies only, colorectal/abdominal, obstetrics, lower extremity, groin/vascular, cardiac), heterogeneity tests were nonsignificant (P > 0.05). All fixed-effects meta-analyses were significant in favor of ciNPT use over traditional dressings (P < 0.05). When the random-effects analyses were performed, all analyses except obstetrics remained significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For all meta-analyses performed using the fixed-effects approach, ciNPT usage demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in incidence of SSI relative to traditional dressings.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)是一种严重的手术并发症。在已发表的文献中,应用切口密闭负压治疗(ciNPT)与降低 SSI 发生率有关。本荟萃分析研究了 ciNPT 与传统敷料相比,在减少闭合切口 SSI 方面的效果。

方法

使用 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、OVID、EMBASE、ScienceDirect 和 QUOSA 进行系统文献检索,重点关注 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日期间的出版物。提取研究参与者的特征、手术程序、使用的敷料类型、治疗持续时间、SSI 发生率和随访时间。计算每个出版物中研究组和对照组的加权优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),以进行分析。使用 Mantel-Haenszel 比值作为汇总统计量合并治疗效果,对每个分析均采用固定效应模型。使用卡方检验对异质性进行统计学评估。对每个进行的荟萃分析,都采用更为保守的随机效应模型进行敏感性分析。

结果

所有荟萃分析(仅随机对照试验、仅观察性研究、结直肠/腹部、产科、下肢、腹股沟/血管、心脏)的异质性检验均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有固定效应荟萃分析均支持 ciNPT 优于传统敷料(P<0.05)。当进行随机效应分析时,除产科外,所有分析均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

所有使用固定效应方法进行的荟萃分析均表明,与传统敷料相比,ciNPT 的使用可显著降低 SSI 的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验