Suppr超能文献

使用超声成像方法在最大曲率平面上测量Cobb角的评分者内和评分者间可靠性

Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method.

作者信息

Trac Suzana, Zheng Rui, Hill Doug L, Lou Edmond

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R3.

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R3; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, 116 St. and 85 Ave., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R3.

出版信息

Spine Deform. 2019 Jan;7(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.06.015.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective reliability study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the intra- and interrater reliability of Cobb angle measurements on the plane of maximum curvature (PMC) using ultrasound (US) images on children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior (PA) radiographs is the gold standard to assess curve severity. However, the PA Cobb angle does not reflect the true three-dimensional deformity.

METHODS

One hundred one children with AIS (87 F; 14 M) (age: 13.7 ± 1.7 years) were recruited and 157 curves were recorded by clinicians on radiographs. Three raters, R1, R2, and R3 with 0, 4, and 20+ years of experience, respectively, measured the PA Cobb, vertebral axial rotation (VAR), PMC Cobb, and PMC orientations on US images. The true PMC orientations were determined using 3D reconstructions on the PA and lateral EOS radiographs. The reliability of R1 measurements on PMC orientations were validated using intermethod (US vs. EOS measurements) with the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Inter- and intrarater reliabilities, standard error measurements, and Bland-Altman's bias were used to report the PMC Cobb and VAR measurements.

RESULTS

Intermethod, inter-, and intrarater ICC(2,1) values for all reliability assessments were greater than 0.9. The mean absolute differences and the standard error measurements for both PMC Cobb and VAR were less than 4° and 0.5°, respectively. The PMC orientation was strongly correlated (r = 0.88) between both measurement modalities. There appeared to be a positive association between the difference of PMC and PA Cobb when the PA Cobb and the maximum VAR were greater than 30° and 14°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The PMC Cobb and VAR can be measured reliably on US images. Future studies should validate the PMC Cobb angle and to include a wider Cobb angle range on participants.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性可靠性研究。

目的

利用超声(US)图像,研究青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患儿在最大曲率平面(PMC)上Cobb角测量的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

背景数据总结

后前位(PA)X线片上的Cobb角测量是评估侧弯严重程度的金标准。然而,PA Cobb角并不能反映真正的三维畸形。

方法

招募101例AIS患儿(87例女性;14例男性)(年龄:13.7±1.7岁),临床医生在X线片上记录了157条侧弯。三位观察者,R1、R2和R3,分别有0年、4年和20多年的经验,测量了PA Cobb角、椎体轴向旋转(VAR)、PMC Cobb角以及US图像上的PMC方向。使用PA和侧位EOS X线片上的三维重建确定真正的PMC方向。通过组内相关系数(ICC),采用方法间(US与EOS测量)验证R对PMC方向测量的可靠性。使用观察者间和观察者内可靠性、标准误差测量以及Bland-Altman偏差来报告PMC Cobb角和VAR测量结果报告。

结果

所有可靠性评估的方法间、观察者间和观察者内ICC(2,1)值均大于0.9。PMC Cobb角和VAR的平均绝对差异和标准误差测量分别小于4°和0.5°。两种测量方式之间,PMC方向呈强相关性(r = 0.88)。当PA Cobb角和最大VAR分别大于30°和14°时,PMC与PA Cobb角的差异之间似乎存在正相关。

结论

在US图像上可以可靠地测量PMC Cobb角和VAR。未来的研究应验证PMC Cobb角,并纳入更广泛的Cobb角范围的参与者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验